Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
Summary: Review Request: RutilT Product: Fedora Extras Version: devel Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: normal Priority: normal Component: Package Review AssignedTo: nobody@fedoraproject.org ReportedBy: kwizart@gmail.com QAContact: fedora-package-review@redhat.com
Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/5/SRPMS/RutilT-0.11-1.kwizart.FC5.src.rpm Description: Configuration tool for Ralink Wireless devices
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-08-14 17:57 EST ------- Configuration tool for Rt2400 rt2500 rt2570 rt2600 wifi chipset Related to rt2500-kmod and rt2500 packages... (driver for rt2500 Ralink chipset) web : http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com forum : http://rt2x00.serialmonkey.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?p=12685#12685
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:06 EST ------- ExclusiveArch: i686 x86_64
You need a note explaining why it won't work elsewhere
BuildRequires: gtk2-devel
You also need desktop-file-utils
sh configure.sh \ --prefix=%{_prefix}
Not required
%configure --prefix=%{_prefix} (though the --prefix shouldn't be needed either)
%install
needs rm -rf $RPM_BUILD_ROOT at the start is there no make install on the package?
%{_datadir}/rutilt/RutilT128x128.png %{_datadir}/rutilt/RutilT16x16.png ...etc
Not needed
%{_datadir}/rutilt/
does the same job and you don't need all the pngs listed. It also gives the package ownership of that directory
%{_datadir}/applications/livna-RutilT.desktop
Um? livna?
cat > %{name}.desktop <<EOF
No Version tag or try-exec (not sure if try-exec is strictly needed though)
install -m 0755 rutilt_helper $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/rutilt/rutilt_helper install -m 0755 set_ip.sh $RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_datadir}/rutilt/set_ip.sh
These don't look like they're in the right place. Could you check them as I have a feeling rutilt_help should be in %{_bindir} with set_ip possibly in /sbin
Plenty to be getting on with there...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-14 18:07 EST ------- Just a thought, shouldn't those png files conform to them being placed in the normal icons directory?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |NOTABUG
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-08-15 08:07 EST ------- Hello! The script make install exist but cannot work well with %RPM_BUILD_ROOT (ie: the binary searches icons in /var/tmp/RutilTv0.11-buildroot/usr/share/rutilt where it should be /usr/share/rutilt. I was using sh configure.sh --prefix=$RPM_BUILD_ROOT%{_prefix} - So i've just noted where make install place files and use normal prefix to manual install files...
What is the regular way of updatating the .spec file? - Make a patch and import (what's the old/new name?) - Upload to new version of the .spec on my website?
Quote of INSTALL file: " - Rutilt helper's install path has changed between v0.07 and v0.08. Before, it was /usr/libexec/, it's now /usr/local/share/rutilt/. Ditto with the main binary, is was previously installed in /usr/bin/, it's now in /usr/local/bin/. Make sure you erase the old binaries. ... - "make install" installed the program in /usr/sbin before v0.06, it's now /usr/bin. Make sure you erase your old binary."
-> so maybe i can change from /usr/share to /usr/local/share? what is the name of this directory for using in a spec file? But INSTALL is not really clear so i've used path result of the make install script...
changed livna to extra and %{_datadir} png.... ExclusiveArch: may be dropped (ppc version of the kmod-rt2500 may be very buggy )
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2006-08-15 09:45 EST ------- Why has this ticket been closed?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|CLOSED |NEW Keywords| |Reopened Resolution|NOTABUG |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-08-15 09:54 EST ------- reopen (don't know why it has closed) really new to bugzilla so i need also a sponsort!
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |177841 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 10:04 EST ------- You will also need to add the review of RutiL-kmod will block this and that this will block RutiL-utils
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-08-15 10:54 EST ------- Not sure to understand well! Don't know if its really a kmod because it do not produce .ko file! But it's true he seems to need a kernel path (maybe to include headers of wireless extensions...) So, do you expect that I need to make kdump smp xenO or XenU versions of this? Or only provides binaries to related kernel version like 2174_FC5?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From paul@all-the-johnsons.co.uk 2006-08-15 11:05 EST ------- This application (i.e. the application associated to this bug) is not the kernel module but the configuration tool for said module. You need to file this question against the kmod package you've submitted.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-08-15 12:02 EST ------- OK!
But this config file also work for rt2400 rt2570and rt2600. That 's why i've proposed an independant package for RutilT. It can be linked inside rt2500-kmod to provide rt2500-kmod-util ( I don't know how to do this for now - with use of kmodtool) Or use requires: RutilT-kmod inside rt2500-kmod to link with the same kernel version. Since this config tool is optionnal (not needed by rt2500-kmod which provide ra2500config ) but is smarter than the one provided. I have proposed not do link it with the driver for now...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-09-08 19:03 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/SPECS/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/testing/RutilT-0.12-3_FC5.src.rpm Description: Configuration tool for Ralink Wireless devices.
This utility is now required by kmod-rt2500 rpmlint is silent (but debug package is empty - need to be disabled - how?)
Not sure about how to link to wireless.h for Fedora Core 5... Need to define kversion (for FC4, FC6). Default is kversion 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
davidf@sjsoft.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |202528 nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|202528 | nThis| |
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2006-10-02 20:39 EST ------- Since the Ralink chipset works better with system-config-network, i will not add : "Requires: RuiltT" from the new rt2x00-kmod-common. It remains one problem about root access ( file need to be setuid - but this is a potential security risk as i know!)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |kevin@tummy.com
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-06-04 23:59 EST ------- Whats the status of this request? Does this tool work with the now in kernel rt2* modules?
Do you still wish to submit it?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Summary|Review Request: RutilT |Review Request: RutilT - | |Diagnostic tools for Ralink | |Wireless devices
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2007-06-05 09:02 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora... Description: Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
This package do not build in mock (debuginfo contain BuildRoot...). I don't know why since whith rpmbuild -ba everything went right...
For now unsure about pam config (testing from my repository) Previously i was setiuid root rutilt...
This package might be usefull for rt2x00 users (from 2.6.21 kernel) also! I would recommand to build it for FC-5 (if not end of life) until devel ...
only rt61pci and rt73usb module requires an additionnal firmware. Others Ralink's chipsets are promoted by the FSF...
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kevin@tummy.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163776, 177841 | nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From kevin@tummy.com 2007-06-05 12:58 EST ------- Well, I don't have this hardware, so I can't really test it. Perhaps you could post to the devel list and see if there is anyone out there with the hardware that would like to review this package?
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
bugzilla@redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-07-06 13:16 EST ------- I can't fetch the SRPM from the above URL.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2007-07-06 15:46 EST ------- Spec URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/RutilT.spec SRPM URL: http://kwizart.free.fr/fedora/6/testing/RutilT/RutilT-0.15-1.kwizart.fc7.src... Description: Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
Ok updated to new 0.15 Beginning a testing campaign for Ralinks users and 2.6.21 kernels
For now, i expect something wrong with PAM implementation, this is the purpose of the testing... (from this i may ask advices on the pam ml)
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2007-07-06 15:53 EST ------- Created an attachment (id=158701) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=158701&action=vie...) fedora-7-x86_64 mock logs 0.15-1
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
------- Additional Comments From tibbs@math.uh.edu 2007-07-27 19:58 EST ------- This fails to build for me:
+ desktop-file-install --vendor fedora --dir /var/tmp/RutilT-0.15-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications --delete-original --mode 644 rutilt.desktop rutilt.desktop: key "Categories" is a list and does not have a semicolon as trailing character, fixing /var/tmp/RutilT-0.15-1.fc8-root-mockbuild/usr/share/applications/fedora-rutilt.desktop: error: value "0.14" for key "Version" in group "Desktop Entry" is not a known version
This is in mock on x86_64 rawhide. I think desktop-file-utils has grown some additional checks. The killer here is Version, which is supposed to be the version of the desktop file specification that your .desktop file follows, not the version of your package.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: RutilT - Diagnostic tools for Ralink Wireless devices
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=202521
kwizart@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |CLOSED Resolution| |WONTFIX
------- Additional Comments From kwizart@gmail.com 2007-11-16 09:19 EST ------- I'm not interested in this app anymore... Ralink's wireless devices works fine without it, and it as some securities weaks (using external sudoers) that make it difficult to uses with the current NM enhancements...)
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org