Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 steve(a)silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO| |191516 nThis| | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 tibbs(a)math.uh.edu changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|163778 |163779 nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From tibbs(a)math.uh.edu 2006-05-12 13:50 EST ------- A mock build on x86_64 development failed; it seems perl-Module-Build needs perl(YAML) < 0.49, but 0.58 is in the repo. Oops. An FC5 build works. * package meets naming and packaging guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. Licence texts are included in the package. * source files match upstream: 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz 2ede77af4d3b82ffb39cd28fda6857e5 Test-Portability-Files-0.05.tar.gz-srpm * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * package builds in mock (fc5, x86_64). * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane. * no shared libraries are present. * package is not relocatable. * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * %clean is present. * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful, 2 tests skipped. Files=5, Tests=5, 0 wallclock secs ( 0.17 cusr + 0.06 csys = 0.23 CPU) * no scriptlets present. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -docs subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. * no headers. * no pkgconfig files. * no libtool .la droppings. * not a GUI app. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: perl-Test-Portability-Files https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 steve(a)silug.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE ------- Additional Comments From steve(a)silug.org 2006-05-15 18:58 EST ------- Imported into CVS, branches created, and builds done. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=191509 --- Comment #5 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2011-02-10 12:55:05 EST --- perl-Test-Portability-Files-0.05-3.el4 has been pushed to the Fedora EPEL 4 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug.