3:51 p.m.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Bug ID: 2270856
Summary: Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: Package Review
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Assignee: nobody(a)fedoraproject.org
Reporter: loganjerry(a)gmail.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Spec URL: https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-fplsa/gap-pkg-fplsa.spec
SRPM URL:
https://jjames.fedorapeople.org/gap-pkg-fplsa/gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc41....
Fedora Account System Username: jjames
Description: When K is a finitely-presented Lie algebra, the GAP operation
IsomorphismSCTableAlgebra can be used to make the structure of K explicit, in
the form of an isomorphic algebra given by structure constants, which is much
more amenable to further computations.
This GAP package installs an alternative method for this operation, which calls
an external C program (fplsa version 4.0) to do the hard part of the
computation. This speeds up the calculation and permits larger problems to be
attempted. The external program has much additional functionality which is not
used by the present version of the package.
NOTE: Upstream built their software on the assumption that GAP packages live in
a user's home directory. There is an initialization (.ini) file that, in an
RPM setting, would become unwritable for ordinary users. Therefore, I have
added a patch so that the package looks for ~/.config/gap/fplsa4.ini,
/etc/fplsa4.ini, and fplsa4.ini in the installed package directory, in that
order.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
4:02 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
URL| |https://gap-packages.github
| |.io/FPLSA/
Keywords| |AutomationTriaged
--- Comment #1 from Fedora Review Service <fedora-review-bot(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
Copr build:
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/build/7194507
(succeeded)
Review template:
https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@fedora-review/fedora-...
Please take a look if any issues were found.
---
This comment was created by the fedora-review-service
https://github.com/FrostyX/fedora-review-service
If you want to trigger a new Copr build, add a comment containing new
Spec and SRPM URLs or [fedora-review-service-build] string.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
3:50 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Assignee|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |casper(a)casperlefantom.net
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
CC| |casper(a)casperlefantom.net
Flags| |fedora-review?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
9:49 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #2 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> ---
I see 4 issues in the package:
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names). See below:
- The Name: tag is not using %{pkgname} macro (like in your other package)
- in %%install section: src/fplsa4.ini
- in %%files section, macro again: %{pkgname}4.ini
Also, the doc package seems to be empty, this is an explanation why:
you are creating the doc directory with the %{upname} macro, but the scriptlet
"%gap_copy_docs" is not using the same path.
the scriptlet is printing its own path during the build:
/builddir/build/BUILDROOT/gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/fplsa/doc
(see, there is no upper case in the path)
the result is: the directory %{gap_archdir}/pkg/%{upname}/doc is correctly
packaged, but it is empty, AND there is no rpmbuild warning about the
unpackaged files remaining in the buildroot directory (don't know why).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
2:49 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
--- Comment #3 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank you for the review, Matthieu.
(In reply to Matthieu Saulnier from comment #2)
I see 4 issues in the package:
[!]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names). See below:
- The Name: tag is not using %{pkgname} macro (like in your other package)
That isn't what "consistently uses macros" means. As the parenthetical
remark
indicates, it's talking about using %{_bindir} instead of "/usr/bin",
%{_libdir} instead of "/usr/lib" or "/usr/lib64", etc. Nevertheless,
you are
correct that I have written "Name: gap-pkg-%{pkgname}" in other gap spec files,
so I should be consistent with myself. :-) Fixed.
- in %%install section: src/fplsa4.ini
- in %%files section, macro again: %{pkgname}4.ini
Hmmm, %files has "%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fplsa4.ini" in my copy.
Did I upload a version that has "%{pkgname}4.ini"? In any case, the version I
just uploaded consistently uses the name "fplsa4.ini" everywhere.
Also, the doc package seems to be empty, this is an explanation why:
Oops! Yes, %gap_copy_docs needs a -n argument. Fixed.
The new spec and source rpm files are at the same URLs as above.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:13 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
--- Comment #4 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> ---
(In reply to Jerry James from comment #3)
(In reply to Matthieu Saulnier from comment #2)
> - in %%install section: src/fplsa4.ini
>
> - in %%files section, macro again: %{pkgname}4.ini
Hmmm, %files has "%config(noreplace) %{_sysconfdir}/fplsa4.ini" in my copy.
Did I upload a version that has "%{pkgname}4.ini"? In any case, the version
I just uploaded consistently uses the name "fplsa4.ini" everywhere.
Fine. That's not a blocker anyway.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
9:48 a.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+
--- Comment #5 from Matthieu Saulnier <casper(a)casperlefantom.net> ---
Package Review
==============
Legend:
[x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated
Observations
============
- All the issues mentionned before, has been fixed.
- The rpmlint warning:
gap-pkg-fplsa.spec:59: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
is justified and commented in the SPEC file.
- GAP documentation MUST be installed under %{gap_libdir}/pkg or
%{gap_archdir}/pkg, this is done correctly in your package. It produces a lot
of rpmlint complaints. But it is matching the Guideline 100%.
Ref: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/GAP/
===== MUST items =====
C/C++:
[x]: Provides: bundled(gnulib) in place as required.
Note: Sources not installed
[x]: Package does not contain kernel modules.
[x]: If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a
BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang.
[x]: Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la)
[x]: Package contains no static executables.
[x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs.
Generic:
[x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets
other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging
Guidelines.
[x]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license.
Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses
found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU General Public License, Version
2", "*No copyright* GNU General Public License, Version 2", "*No
copyright* GNU General Public License v2.0 or later". 160 files have
unknown license.
[x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed.
[x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses.
[x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise.
[x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception.
[x]: Changelog in prescribed format.
Note: %%autochangelog macro used.
[x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content.
[-]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application.
[-]: Development files must be in a -devel package
[x]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime.
[x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory
names).
[x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines.
[x]: Package does not generate any conflict.
[x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target.
[-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and
Provides are present.
[x]: Requires correct, justified where necessary.
[x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English.
[-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need.
[x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise.
[x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag.
Note: ExcludeArch used is optional.
[x]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines
[x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least
one supported primary architecture.
[x]: Package installs properly.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the
license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the
license(s) for the package is included in %license.
[x]: The License field must be a valid SPDX expression.
[x]: Package must own all directories that it creates.
[x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages.
[x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT
[x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the
beginning of %install.
[x]: %config files are marked noreplace or the reason is justified.
[x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time.
[x]: Dist tag is present.
[x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files.
[x]: Permissions on files are set properly.
[x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages.
[x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't
work.
[x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters.
[x]: No %config files under /usr.
[x]: Package does not use a name that already exists.
[x]: Package is not relocatable.
[x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as
provided in the spec URL.
[x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format
%{name}.spec.
[x]: File names are valid UTF-8.
[x]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size
(~1MB) or number of files.
Note: Documentation size is 4934 bytes in 2 files.
[x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local
===== SHOULD items =====
Generic:
[-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate
file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it.
[x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments).
[x]: Package functions as described.
[x]: Latest version is packaged.
[x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream.
[x]: Patches link to upstream bugs/comments/lists or are otherwise
justified.
[-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream
publishes signatures.
[x]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported
architectures.
[x]: %check is present and all tests pass.
[x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed
files.
[x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock.
[x]: Buildroot is not present
[x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or
$RPM_BUILD_ROOT)
[x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin.
[x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable.
[x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file
[x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag
[x]: SourceX is a working URL.
[x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified.
===== EXTRA items =====
Generic:
[x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s).
Note: No rpmlint messages.
[x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages.
Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment).
[x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package
is arched.
[x]: Spec file according to URL is the same as in SRPM.
Rpmlint
-------
Checking: gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
gap-pkg-fplsa-debugsource-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc40.src.rpm
======================================================= rpmlint session starts
=======================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpuvzmynz2')]
checks: 32, packages: 5
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/chooser.html
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/lefttoc.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/manual.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/manual.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/nocolorprompt.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/ragged.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/rainbow.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/times.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/toggless.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/toggless.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
gap-pkg-fplsa.spec:59: W: configure-without-libdir-spec
================= 5 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 13 warnings, 31
filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.5 s =================
Rpmlint (debuginfo)
-------------------
Checking: gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo-1.2.6-1.fc40.x86_64.rpm
======================================================= rpmlint session starts
=======================================================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
rpmlintrc: [PosixPath('/tmp/tmpz6up4i06')]
checks: 32, packages: 1
================== 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings, 5
filtered, 0 badness; has taken 0.1 s ==================
Rpmlint (installed packages)
----------------------------
============================ rpmlint session starts
============================
rpmlint: 2.5.0
configuration:
/usr/lib/python3.12/site-packages/rpmlint/configdefaults.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-legacy-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora-spdx-licenses.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/fedora.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/scoring.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/users-groups.toml
/etc/xdg/rpmlint/warn-on-functions.toml
checks: 32, packages: 4
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: only-non-binary-in-usr-lib
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: no-documentation
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/chooser.html
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/chooser.html
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/lefttoc.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/lefttoc.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/manual.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/manual.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/manual.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/manual.js
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/nocolorprompt.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/nocolorprompt.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/ragged.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/ragged.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/rainbow.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/rainbow.js
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/times.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/times.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/toggless.css
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/toggless.css
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc.x86_64: W: dangling-symlink
/usr/lib64/gap/pkg/FPLSA/doc/toggless.js
/usr/share/gap/pkg/GAPDoc/styles/toggless.js
4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 12 warnings, 28 filtered, 0
badness; has taken 0.4 s
Source checksums
----------------
https://github.com/gap-packages/FPLSA/archive/v1.2.6/FPLSA-1.2.6.tar.gz :
CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package :
e7c31c03b6fea06f2842ed0738da76bf97770baef46855b47d79d276ea1f1b20
CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package :
e7c31c03b6fea06f2842ed0738da76bf97770baef46855b47d79d276ea1f1b20
Requires
--------
gap-pkg-fplsa (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
config(gap-pkg-fplsa)
gap-core(x86-64)
libc.so.6()(64bit)
rtld(GNU_HASH)
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
gap-online-help
gap-pkg-fplsa(x86-64)
gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
gap-pkg-fplsa-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered):
Provides
--------
gap-pkg-fplsa:
config(gap-pkg-fplsa)
gap-pkg-fplsa
gap-pkg-fplsa(x86-64)
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc:
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc
gap-pkg-fplsa-doc(x86-64)
gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo:
debuginfo(build-id)
gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo
gap-pkg-fplsa-debuginfo(x86-64)
gap-pkg-fplsa-debugsource:
gap-pkg-fplsa-debugsource
gap-pkg-fplsa-debugsource(x86-64)
----------------
PACKAGE APPROVED
----------------
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
--- Comment #6 from Jerry James <loganjerry(a)gmail.com> ---
Thank you very much for the review, Matthieu!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |POST
--- Comment #7 from Fedora Admin user for bugzilla script actions
<fedora-admin-xmlrpc(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
The Pagure repository was created at
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/gap-pkg-fplsa
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
8:56 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|POST |MODIFIED
--- Comment #8 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62 (gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc40) has been submitted as an
update to Fedora 40.
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
7:55 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|MODIFIED |ON_QA
--- Comment #9 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62 has been pushed to the Fedora 40 testing repository.
Soon you'll be able to install the update with the following command:
`sudo dnf install --enablerepo=updates-testing --refresh
--advisory=FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62 \*`
You can provide feedback for this update here:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62
See also https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for more information
on how to test updates.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
4:33 p.m.
New subject: [Bug 2270856] Review Request: gap-pkg-fplsa - Finitely presented Lie
algebras
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ON_QA |CLOSED
Resolution|--- |ERRATA
Last Closed| |2024-04-19 21:33:47
--- Comment #10 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org> ---
FEDORA-2024-21cc3a6a62 (gap-pkg-fplsa-1.2.6-1.fc40) has been pushed to the
Fedora 40 stable repository.
If problem still persists, please make note of it in this bug report.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2270856
Report this comment as SPAM:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=rep...
44
days inactive
73
days old
package-review@lists.fedoraproject.org
11 comments
1 participants
participants (1)
-
bugzilla＠redhat.com