https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442576 Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #2 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Hello Philipp, I checked your FAS name [1] and as I see, you are not approved in the packager group yet. I suggest you read [2] if you did not do so yet. I am blocking FE-NEEDSPONSOR with this bug. About your package: - You should not generate an "empty" golang-github-restic-chunker with just a license file and a readme file. It's ok to generate just the -devel and the -unit-test subpackages if this package is a dependency for something else you want to package in Fedora. Note that if it is not a dependency for something, there is no point in packaging it: we recommend using 'go get' for development. - There is no need for the content in the %%build section since there is no binary files associated with this package. - You did disabled the builds of the devel and of the unit-tests subpackages, it means that this package generates a single binary package, with a README file and a LICENSE file. I do not believe that is useful at all. I guess you wanted to package, at least, the devel subpackage. [1] [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1442576 --- Comment #3 from Athos Ribeiro <athoscribeiro(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Also, if you want to go on with the process to become a packager, it would be nice to see a few informal package reviews from you. Read [1] and [2], find some packages you would like to review and do so in an informal way: do not assign the ticket for yourself and inform the packager that is an informal review. Make sure the package adheres to the packaging guidelines. You can post links to your informal reviews here in this ticket as you perform them. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process [2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ReviewGuidelines -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component