Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |jplesnik(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? | -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #1 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-05-09 05:04:09 EDT --- Issues: * file size mismatch Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz = 6738, http://www.cpan.org/modules/by-module/Sys/Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz = 6802 * missing BR: perl(Test::More) * invalid license. It should be LGPLv2+ When you fix the issues, I'll continue with review. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #3 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-05-09 06:24:45 EDT --- * missing BR: perl(Data::Dumper) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #5 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-05-09 10:40:02 EDT --- Package Review ============== Key: - = N/A x = Pass ! = Fail ? = Not evaluated ==== C/C++ ==== [-]: MUST Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. [x]: MUST Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) [x]: MUST Package does not contain kernel modules. [x]: MUST Package contains no static executables. [x]: MUST Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. [x]: MUST Package is not relocatable. [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. Note: perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm : /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so ==== Generic ==== [x]: MUST Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one supported primary architecture. [x]: MUST %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. [x]: MUST All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires, except for any that are listed in the exceptions section of Packaging Guidelines. [!]: MUST Buildroot is not present Note: Buildroot is not needed unless packager plans to package for EPEL5 [x]: MUST Package contains no bundled libraries. [x]: MUST Changelog in prescribed format. [x]: MUST Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) Note: Clean is needed only if supporting EPEL [x]: MUST Sources contain only permissible code or content. [!]: MUST Each %files section contains %defattr if rpm < 4.4 Note: defattr(....) present in %files section. This is OK if packaging for EPEL5. Otherwise not needed [x]: MUST Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. [x]: MUST Package requires other packages for directories it uses. [x]: MUST Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. [-]: MUST Package is not known to require ExcludeArch. [x]: MUST Permissions on files are set properly. [x]: MUST Package does not contain duplicates in %files. [x]: MUST Spec file lacks Packager, Vendor, PreReq tags. [!]: MUST Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the beginning of %install. Note: rm -rf is only needed if supporting EPEL5 [-]: MUST Large documentation files are in a -doc subpackage, if required. [x]: MUST If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the license(s) for the package is included in %doc. [x]: MUST License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. [x]: MUST Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory names). [x]: MUST Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. [x]: MUST Package does not generate any conflict. [x]: MUST Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. [x]: MUST Package must own all directories that it creates. [x]: MUST Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. [x]: MUST Package installs properly. [x]: MUST Requires correct, justified where necessary. [x]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US totalmem -> teetotal perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US freemem -> freemen, Freeman, freeman perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so MemInfo.so perl-Sys-MemInfo.i686: W: private-shared-object-provides /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/auto/Sys/MemInfo/MemInfo.so MemInfo.so 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 4 warnings. rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc18.src.rpm perl-Sys-MemInfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US totalmem -> teetotal perl-Sys-MemInfo.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US freemem -> freemen, Freeman, freeman 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. rpmlint perl-Sys-MemInfo-debuginfo-0.91-1.fc18.i686.rpm 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. [x]: MUST Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as provided in the spec URL. /home/jplesnik/review/820090/Sys-MemInfo-0.91.tar.gz : MD5SUM this package : d2ddda32c58114352e04ecb866de7f17 MD5SUM upstream package : d2ddda32c58114352e04ecb866de7f17 [x]: MUST Spec file is legible and written in American English. [x]: MUST Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. [-]: MUST Package contains a SysV-style init script if in need of one. [x]: MUST File names are valid UTF-8. [-]: MUST Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. [x]: SHOULD Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. [-]: SHOULD If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. [x]: SHOULD Dist tag is present. [x]: SHOULD No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. [!]: SHOULD Final provides and requires are sane (rpm -q --provides and rpm -q --requires). [x]: SHOULD Package functions as described. [x]: SHOULD Latest version is packaged. [-]: SHOULD Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. [x]: SHOULD SourceX is a working URL. [-]: SHOULD Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. [x]: SHOULD Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported architectures. [x]: SHOULD %check is present and all tests pass. [x]: SHOULD Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed files. [x]: SHOULD Spec use %global instead of %define. Issues: TODO: Add filter "%{?perl_default_filter}" before %description. After that the MemInfo.so will not be added to Provides. It should solve following * [!]: MUST Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. * [!]: MUST Rpmlint output is silent. (The spelling errors could be ignored) * rpm -q --provides will not contain MemInfo.so. TODO: Removed Buildroot if you don't plan to package for EPEL5 TODO: Remove %clean section if not supporting EPEL TODO: Remove defattr(....) in %files section if not supporting EPEL5. TODO: Remove rm -rf %{buildroot} at the beginning of %install if not supporting EPEL5. I'll approve the package once the above are fixed. Generated by fedora-review 0.2.0git External plugins: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #7 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-05-10 04:38:21 EDT --- perl-Sys-MemInfo.src:29: W: macro-in-comment %{perl_vendorarch} perl-Sys-MemInfo.src:30: W: macro-in-comment %{perl_vendorarch} Please remove the commented line from %install section (mv, ln). BTW, if you want to comment out line with rpm macro, you have to add one % before the macro (e.g. %%{perl_vendorarch}). -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #9 from Jitka Plesnikova <jplesnik(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-05-10 07:02:31 EDT --- Approving now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #11 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; 2012-05-10 08:31:52 EDT --- Git done (by process-git-requests). Removed f18, that's devel and is automatic. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #12 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; 2012-05-10 09:22:15 EDT --- perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 has been submitted as an update for Fedora 16. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ON_QA |CLOSED Resolution|--- |ERRATA Last Closed| |2012-05-29 06:37:12 --- Comment #14 from Fedora Update System <updates(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- perl-Sys-MemInfo-0.91-1.fc16 has been pushed to the Fedora 16 stable repository. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #16 from Jan Synacek <jsynacek(a)redhat.com&gt; --- (In reply to comment #15) Feel free to maintain it there. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=820090 --- Comment #18 from Jon Ciesla <limburgher(a)gmail.com&gt; --- Git done (by process-git-requests). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.