https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390 --- Comment #1 from Brigham Keys <bkeys(a)bkeys.org&gt; --- I have added this package as a copr repo, and it has successfully built on all recent versions of Fedora and CentOS Stream. Here is the link: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bkeys/nibbles/build/4813230/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390 Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla(a)linuxnetz.de&gt; --- Oh, according FAS, you are not a Fedora packager yet; setting FE-NEEDSPONSOR. Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390 --- Comment #5 from Brigham Keys <bkeys(a)bkeys.org&gt; --- Created attachment 1913862 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1913862&action=edit This is a new SRPM with all of Robert's suggestedchanges This new SRPM builds successfully on all relevant platforms on copr https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/bkeys/nibbles/build/4870465/ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390 Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |jkadlcik(a)redhat.com --- Comment #7 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com&gt; --- Thank you for the package Brigham, and also for making the changes Typically you should always post the updated package the same way you did in the bug description, i.e. Spec URL: ... SRPM URL: ... There are tools like `fedora-review` that can parse the BZ comments, find the newest package, download it, run some checks on it, and make the reviewer's life easier. This is fine, and I have no problem with this. Just from a personal experience, I find it better to write each dependency on a new line, like this: BuildRequires: freeglut-devel BuildRequires: SDL2-devel BuildRequires: cmake BuildRequires: gcc BuildRequires: gcc-c++ This way you can have as many dependencies as you need and you are not limited by line length, and also it is much clearer in git diffs what dependency was added and when. But if you prefer the single-line format, that's fine as well. I just wanted to make it known, that there is an alternative. I am a bit uneasy that there are both LICENSE and COPYING files and they are not the same (although they both appear to be GPLv3). Since you are the upstream developer, I think you can easily fix this within the project itself. Or I would just do %license COPYING %license LICENSE to install them both. Otherwise, the package looks good to me. --- Since this would be your first Fedora package, you will need to get sponsored into the `packager' group before this package can be accepted. I recently became a sponsor and I would like to sponsor you. That would make it my responsibility to guide you through the processes that you will do, and the tools that you will need as a package maintainer. I would also be there to answer your packaging-related questions, or to help you find somebody who knows the answers. But before that, I should make sure that you will be able to fulfill your package maintainer responsibilities https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Package_maintainer_responsibil... Please take a look here https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Packager_sponsor_policy/#requi... I think the most beneficial option for you as a sponsoree would be reviewing 2-3 packages from somebody else. It will help you understand the packaging guidelines better but at the same time, it will help somebody else to get also their packages accepted to Fedora. If you are interested, please ping me on #fedora-devel IRC, my nick is FrostyX, or send me an email, and we can get started. I will explain what is necessary as we go. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are always notified about changes to this product and component You are on the CC list for the bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390

Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Component: Package Review Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com&gt; has canceled Package Review <package-review(a)lists.fedoraproject.org&gt;&#39;s request for Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com&gt;&#39;s needinfo: Bug 2129390: Review Request: nibbles - A snake game written using C++, SDL2, and Opengl with 3D graphics https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2129390 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Kadlčík <jkadlcik(a)redhat.com&gt; --- I am interested in reviewing this ticket but there is no response from the contributor.