https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531861

Ilya Gradina ilya.gradina@gmail.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |ilya.gradina@gmail.com

--- Comment #1 from Ilya Gradina ilya.gradina@gmail.com --- I'll review it.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531861

--- Comment #2 from Ilya Gradina ilya.gradina@gmail.com --- REVIEW:

Legend: + = PASSED, - = FAILED, 0 = Not Applicable

The package is mostly autogenerated, so everything is built according to the Guidelines.

+ The package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. + The spec file name matches the base package %{name}, in the format %{name}.spec. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines. + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The License field in the package spec file matches the actual license (MIT or Apache 2.0). + The files, containing the text of the license(s) for the package, are included as %license. + The spec file is written in American English. + The spec file for the package is legible. + The package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least one primary architecture. + All build dependencies are listed in BuildRequires. 0 No need to handle locales. 0 No shared library files in some of the dynamic linker's default paths. + The package does NOT bundle copies of system libraries. 0 The package is not designed to be relocatable. + The package owns all directories that it creates. + The package does not list a file more than once in the spec file's %files listings. + Permissions on files are set properly. + The package consistently uses macros. + The package contains code, or permissible content. 0 No extremely large documentation files. + Anything, the package includes as %doc, does not affect the runtime of the application. 0 No C/C++ header files. 0 No static libraries. 0 No pkgconfig(.pc) files. 0 The package doesn't contain library files without a suffix (e.g. libfoo.so) in some of the dynamic linker's default paths. + The package does NOT contain any .la libtool archives. 0 Not a GUI application. + The package does not own files or directories already owned by other packages. + All filenames in rpm packages are valid UTF-8.

APPROVED.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531861

Igor Gnatenko ignatenko@redhat.com changed:

What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assignee|nobody@fedoraproject.org |ilya.gradina@gmail.com

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1531861

--- Comment #3 from Gwyn Ciesla limburgher@gmail.com --- (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/rust-failure