https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 Erik Schilling <ablu.erikschilling(a)googlemail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |177841 (FE-NEEDSPONSOR) Referenced Bugs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=177841 [Bug 177841] Tracker: Review requests from new Fedora packagers who need a sponsor -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #2 from Jake Petroules <jake.petroules(a)petroules.com&gt; --- Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jakepetroules/spec-qbs/1.4/qbs.spec SRPM URL: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11070463 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #4 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- jakepetroules's scratch build of qbs-1.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11248240 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #6 from Jake Petroules <jake.petroules(a)petroules.com&gt; --- So, how can we start moving this review process forward? This has already been in the works since 2012 or 2013 and I'd really like to get things moving. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #8 from Upstream Release Monitoring <upstream-release-monitoring(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; --- jakepetroules's scratch build of qbs-1.4.2-1.fc22.src.rpm for rawhide completed http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=11578571 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #10 from Jake Petroules <jake.petroules(a)petroules.com&gt; --- Updated URLs: Spec URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jakepetroules/spec-qbs/1.4/SPECS/qbs.spec SRPM URL: https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jakepetroules/spec-qbs/1.4/SRPMS/qbs-1.... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1262515 --- Comment #12 from Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael(a)gmx.net&gt; --- (!) 404 not found for the src.rpm Hmmm. Does the comment above that also refer to the two -static packages? Why would tests require linking statically? Since BuildRequires apply to the entire package, the availability of the static libs in the buildroot can be problematic due to linking other executables statically (either accidentally, unknowingly or because of build defaults changing eventually). That would be something to avoid by adding guards or finding ways to eliminate static linking in those tests. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Statically_Linking_Ex... [...] Has "fedora-review -b 1262515" been run for this ticket yet? [...] If these shall stay completely separate subpackages, consider fixing the directory ownership and %license usage for these packages. * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:LicensingGuidelines#License_Text * https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#The_directory_is_owne... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component