Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |petersen(a)redhat.com Flag| |needinfo?(jude(a)pwan.org) --- Comment #2 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2010-12-01 19:59:46 EST --- Can I ask you to update to cabal2spec-0.22.2, please? (Sorry I only just get round to backporting it to F13 until now.) Also please add a changelog entry and fill in the license. We use ghc_pkg_deps for the haskell dependencies rather than direct Buildrequires. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 JudeNagurney <jude(a)pwan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|needinfo?(jude(a)pwan.org) | --- Comment #4 from JudeNagurney <jude(a)pwan.org&gt; 2010-12-11 08:07:40 EST --- I have published an updated spec file and SPRM at the following locations:Spec URL: http://code.haskell.org/augeas/packaging/rpm/ghc-augeas.spec SRPM URL http://code.haskell.org/augeas/packaging/rpm/ghc-augeas-0.3.4-1.fc14.src.rpm I've rebuilt the spec file using caabal2spec-0.22.2, filled out the license, updated the changelog, and switched to using ghc_pkg_deps and ghc_c_pkg_deps instead of direct BuildRequires. (In reply to comment #2) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 JudeNagurney <jude(a)pwan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks| |634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 JudeNagurney <jude(a)pwan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Alias| |ghc-augeas -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Blocks|634048(Haskell-pkg-reviews) | --- Comment #6 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-01-28 06:07:22 EST --- As earlier discussed on Fedora haskell-devel list, dropping libraries for now from the toplevel of Haskell-pkg-reviews, so we, the Haskell SIG, can focus more on getting Haskell apps into Fedora. To get you library back under the tracker please submit a bin or binlib package that depends on this library and make this bug block that package review. It is a good idea to submit full stacks of packages and then to add the toplevel program to the tracker. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard| |notready cabal2spec -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com --- Comment #9 from Lakshmi Narasimhan <lakshminaras2002(a)gmail.com&gt; 2011-11-07 02:22:05 EST --- Hi Please provide a summary and description relevant for the package instead of using the default ones provided by the template. In BuildRequires : ghc-HUnit-devel should be ghc-HUnit-prof , if this package will be built for f14. Also, remove the comment under %build section. Add a new changelog entry in addition to the default one created by the template. Please provide a summary of the changes you have made (in one or two sentences). Increment Release from 0 to 1. Otherwise looks fine. Thanks. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status Whiteboard|notready cabal2spec | --- Comment #11 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2011-11-14 05:01:22 EST --- Thanks for updating I think I can review this for you as sponsor if you can clean up a little more: We usually put the summary and description in common_summary and common_description. Please remember to bump the release number and add a new changelog entry when you update the package. You should use _bindir and _datadir instead of explicitly writing /usr/bin and /usr/share. You can add (doc) files under the %file sections but you need to be careful since secondary archs don't have shared libraries (ie base subpackage). If you are serious about packaging it would also help if you looked at some other packages that need reviewing and posted comments on them - feel free to put links here to any reviews you have looked over. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=656892 --- Comment #12 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com&gt; 2012-04-16 05:53:44 EDT --- Ping? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.