Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED AssignedTo|nobody(a)fedoraproject.org |tibbs(a)math.uh.edu Flag| |fedora-review? --- Comment #1 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2008-10-09 15:51:57 EDT --- I don't really object to it, but I think the first paragraph of %description is content-free in the context of a package description. /usr/bin/one-liner probably should not be shipped; it seems completely pointless, has a generic name, and is already shipped as documentation. My checklist: * source files match upstream: 8cadfb192f92b12d18c0123472924dfe779fefb027051adbff8c7fdcae246778 Sysadm-Install-0.27.tar.gz * package meets naming and versioning guidelines. * specfile is properly named, is cleanly written and uses macros consistently. * summary is OK. * description is OK. * dist tag is present. * build root is OK. * license field matches the actual license. * license is open source-compatible. * license text not included upstream. * latest version is being packaged. * BuildRequires are proper. * %clean is present. * package builds in mock (rawhide, x86_64). * package installs properly. * rpmlint is silent. * final provides and requires are sane: perl(Sysadm::Install) = 0.27 perl-Sysadm-Install = 0.27-1.fc10 = /usr/bin/perl perl >= 0:5.006 perl(:MODULE_COMPAT_5.10.0) perl(Archive::Tar) perl(Cwd) perl(Expect) perl(File::Basename) perl(File::Copy) perl(File::Path) perl(File::Spec::Functions) perl(File::Temp) perl(LWP::Simple) perl(Log::Log4perl) perl(Log::Log4perl::Util) perl(Sysadm::Install) perl(Term::ReadKey) perl(strict) perl(warnings) * %check is present and all tests pass: All tests successful. Files=12, Tests=43, 1 wallclock secs * owns the directories it creates. * doesn't own any directories it shouldn't. * no duplicates in %files. * file permissions are appropriate. * code, not content. * documentation is small, so no -doc subpackage is necessary. * %docs are not necessary for the proper functioning of the package. The package review process needs reviewers! If you haven't done any package reviews recently, please consider doing one. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Jason Tibbitts <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu&gt; 2008-10-16 14:50:03 EDT --- Sorry for not getting back to this sooner. I wonder why rpmlint is now complaining about the perl depencencies in the documentation files. Obviously these aren't problematic but I wonder why I didn't see them before. So that I mention it, they're pairs of the form: perl-Sysadm-Install.noarch: W: spurious-executable-perm /usr/share/doc/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27/eg/ask perl-Sysadm-Install.noarch: W: doc-file-dependency /usr/share/doc/perl-Sysadm-Install-0.27/eg/ask /usr/bin/perl one pair for each executable file in the eg directory. Anyway, everything looks fine to me now. APPROVED -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag| |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #5 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; 2008-10-16 18:54:12 EDT --- New Package CVS Request ======================= Package Name: perl-Sysadm-Install Short Description: Typical installation tasks for system administrators Owners: pghmcfc Branches: F-8 F-9 InitialCC: perl-sig -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 --- Comment #7 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; 2008-10-19 19:41:15 EDT --- Built for Rawhide, F-9, and F-8: Rawhide: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889572 F-9: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889582 F-8: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=889596 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466223 Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flag|fedora-cvs+ |fedora-cvs? --- Comment #9 from Paul Howarth <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; 2010-08-01 12:44:21 EDT --- Package Change Request ====================== Package Name: perl-Sysadm-Install Short Description: Typical installation tasks for system administrators Owners: pghmcfc New Branches: EL-6 InitialCC: perl-sig This hasn't been in EPEL before due to missing dependencies but they're all there in EL-6. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.