Won't be making the FPC meeting tonight
by Hans de Goede
Hi all,
As discussed before 18:00 CET is a really bad time for me (kids need to get
them from daycare, feed them etc, all around this time).
So I won't be attending the meeting tonight.
Regards,
Hans
15 years, 3 months
- 2
- 1
How to create a .spec file for a software that user cmake?
by Henrique Junior
Hi folks,
I'm trying to package a software that use cmake to be build.
In the process the software (octaviz) asks me to do this:
- run ccmake . in Octaviz root directory
- press "c" to configure
- press "g" to generate Makefiles
- press "q" to quit ccmake
- run make
- make install
Can someone give me a hint on the correct way that my %build section needs
to be?
Thanks
--
Henrique "LonelySpooky" Junior
http://www.lonelyspooky.com
-------------------------------------------------------------
"In a world without walls and fences, who needs windows and gates?!"
15 years, 3 months
- 2
- 2
Re: fontpackages template warnings
by Nicolas Mailhot
Le Mar 30 décembre 2008 16:37, Nicolas Mailhot a écrit :
>
> Le Mar 30 décembre 2008 15:29, Sarantis Paskalis a écrit :
>> Hello,
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for adapting your packages and providing feedback!
>
>> I am converting my font packages to the new guidelines and hit some
>> rpmlint warnings that appear to be template related. Specifically,
>> I
>> followed the /etc/rpmdevtools/spectemplate-fonts-multi.spec from
>> fontpackages-devel that creates absolute symlinks between
>> /etc/fonts/conf.d/$font.conf and
>> /usr/share/fontconfig/conf.avail/$font.conf
>> rpmlint moans about the absolute symlink and wants a relative one.
>> I
>> don't really have an opinion about that and could not find any
>> fedora
>> policy on this one [1].
>
> I didn't find a simple (for me and packagers) way to create relative
> symlinks here. Individual packages are not supposed to know the values
> of the directory macros since FPC asked for them in part to hide
> future value changes from individual packagers.
drat, should have read your link before commenting.
I'm not sure how ok it is to add a dep to symlinks for
fontpackages-devel. It looks harmless enough, but is this package even
in all our spins?
I suppose if I change the templates to use the symlinks command to
avoid the rpmlint warning, I need to notify FPC at least (even if it's
a minor change, it's still a guidelines change)
--
Nicolas Mailhot
15 years, 3 months
- 3
- 5