June 2013 - packaging - Fedora Mailing-Lists

by Christopher Meng

Hi, I'm packaging serf into Fedora. Here is the review request: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973904 However, the reviewer said that this package should follow how was packaged in oter distros. Debian and OpenSUSE install headers to /usr/include/serf-1/*.h, but I just packaged them to /usr/include/*.h Now I decide to install them to a new folder, should I keep updated with Debian or OpenSUSE, and install them to /usr/include/serf-1/, or to /usr/include/serf/? Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me

10 years, 10 months

4
5
0 / 0

kbuildsycoca in installation toolchain

by Mario Blättermann

Hi, currently I'm working on a Plasmoid package for KDE [1][2]. In the installation instructions [3], we have kbuildsycoca at the end. For the time being, I've added it to the installation toolchain in the spec file, too. But I was wondering if we need this at all. Maybe it has to be run in a %post and %postun macro? Any explanations would be welcome. Best Regards, Mario [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=973780 [2] http://kde-apps.org/content/show.php/Application%20Name%20Plasmoid?conten... [3] https://github.com/scarpin0/applicationname-plasmoid/wiki/Install

10 years, 10 months

2
1
0 / 0

Re: [Fedora-packaging] {?_isa} wrong package

by Christopher Meng

Got it, thanks.

10 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

{?_isa} wrong package

by Christopher Meng

Hi, Is it a problem related to isa packaging problem? Today's update got this: libsss_idmap{?_isa} = 1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 for package: sssd-ad-1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2.i686 ---> Package sssd-ipa.i686 0:1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 will be installed --> Processing Dependency: libsss_idmap{?_isa} = 1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2 for package: sssd-ipa-1.10.0-8.fc20.beta2.i686 --> Processing Dependency: libipa_hbac{?_isa} Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me

10 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2013-06-13 16:00 - 17:30 UTC)

by James Antill

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by abadger1999 at 16:06:01 UTC. The full logs are available at http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-06-13/fpc.2013-06-... . Meeting summary --------------- * Rollcall (abadger1999, 16:06:57) * Guideline for patches on Source?: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/300 (abadger1999, 16:12:52) * Bundling exception for nodejs-expect-js https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/297 (abadger1999, 16:39:58) * Bundling exception request for watchman (to bundle jansson) https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/298 (abadger1999, 16:46:26) * Open floor (abadger1999, 17:02:47) * LINK: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=964940 (mjg59, 17:05:54) * Proposal to not use arched BuildRequires passes (+1: 5, 0:0, -1:0) (abadger1999, 17:29:25) Meeting ended at 17:30:09 UTC. Action Items ------------ Action Items, by person ----------------------- * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * abadger1999 (61) * tibbs|w (45) * limburgher (41) * geppetto (22) * RemiFedora (17) * racor (9) * Smoother1rOgZ (8) * zodbot (4) * mjg59 (1) * spot (0) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

10 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

About iconsdir macro

by Christopher Meng

Hi, Can we revise the current ScriptletSnippets page to suggest packagers using this macro instead of "%{_datadir}/icons" ? For example, %post /bin/touch --no-create %{_datadir}/icons/hicolor &>/dev/null || : can be: %post /bin/touch --no-create %{_iconsdir}/hicolor &>/dev/null || : Shorter, right? Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me

10 years, 10 months

4
4
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2013-06-13 16:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2013-06-13 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. rktime): 2013-06-13 09:00 Thu US/Pacific 2013-06-13 12:00 Thu US/Eastern 2013-06-13 16:00 Thu UTC <- 2013-06-13 17:00 Thu Europe/London 2013-06-13 18:00 Thu Europe/Paris 2013-06-13 18:00 Thu Europe/Berlin 2013-06-13 21:30 Thu Asia/Calcutta ------------------new day---------------------- 2013-06-14 00:00 Fri Asia/Singapore 2013-06-14 00:00 Fri Asia/Hong_Kong 2013-06-14 01:00 Fri Asia/Tokyo 2013-06-14 02:00 Fri Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 = New business = #topic #297 Bundling exception for nodejs-expect-js .fpc 297 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/297 #topic #298 Bundling exception request for watchman (to bundle jansson) .fpc 298 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/298 #topic #300 RPM: Guideline for patches on Source? .fpc 300 https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/300 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/12 If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc, e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

10 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

Can we allow such URL?

by Christopher Meng

Hi, Handling the GitHub URL is a painful work. Can we allow this? https://github.com/$OWNER/$PROJECT/archive/%{version}.tar.gz Thanks. Yours sincerely, Christopher Meng Always playing in Fedora Project http://cicku.me

10 years, 10 months

8
11
0 / 0

RFE: Documentation packages - no base package dependency

by Michael Schwendt

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Documentation Proposed addition to the guidelines: Independent documentation -doc packages typically don't require the base package. It should be possible to install documentation without having to install a program and all its dependencies. Rationale: Recently, in package review requests, I've seen packagers apply https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Guidelines#Requiring_Base_Package also to -doc packages. And there are packages in the collection, which do that, too. This is a hindrance, especially if one only wants to peruse the documentation or install API documentation for remote developing. Of course, an exception to this is documentation in a special format, which can only be viewed within an application. Thoughts? -- mschwendt Fedora release 19 (Schrödinger’s Cat) - Linux 3.9.4-301.fc19.x86_64 loadavg: 0.16 0.12 0.13

10 years, 10 months

4
3
0 / 0

Want ot take bz #829676 review: pyelftools - Pure-Python library for parsing and analyzing ELF files

by Björn Esser

Hello Michel, hello list! @Michel: Is it OK to you, if'll take over the review for this: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829676 Cheers, Björn

10 years, 10 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging June 2013