Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2015-11-12 17:00 - 18:05 UTC)
by James Antill
======================
#fedora-meeting-1: fpc
======================
Meeting started by geppetto at 17:00:33 UTC. The full logs are available
at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2015-11-12/fpc.2015-11-...
.
Meeting summary
---------------
* Roll Call (geppetto, 17:00:34)
* Schedule (geppetto, 17:09:14)
* LINK:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/packaging/2015-November/011086....
(geppetto, 17:09:19)
* #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++
(geppetto, 17:09:38)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 (geppetto, 17:09:40)
* #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++
compilation environments. (geppetto, 17:09:56)
* LINK: https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540 (geppetto, 17:10:09)
* ACTION: (geppetto, 17:23:46)
* ACTION: Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines
(+1:6, 0:0, -1:0) (geppetto, 17:24:18)
* Open Floor (geppetto, 17:36:05)
Meeting ended at 18:05:16 UTC.
Action Items
------------
*
* Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines (+1:6, 0:0,
-1:0)
Action Items, by person
-----------------------
* **UNASSIGNED**
*
* Promote C and C++ page and link to it from main guidelines (+1:6,
0:0, -1:0)
People Present (lines said)
---------------------------
* geppetto (73)
* tibbs|w (65)
* nirik (13)
* zodbot (11)
* racor (8)
* Rathann (8)
* tomspur (7)
* mbooth (5)
* orionp (5)
* gbcox (1)
* tibbs (0)
Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4
.. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot
8 years, 5 months
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2015-11-11 17:00 UTC)
by James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2015-11-11 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.freenode.net.
Local time information (via. rktime):
2015-11-11 09:00 Wed US/Pacific PST
2015-11-11 12:00 Wed US/Eastern EST
2015-11-11 17:00 Wed UTC <-
2015-11-11 17:00 Wed Europe/London <-
2015-11-11 18:00 Wed Europe/Paris CET
2015-11-11 18:00 Wed Europe/Berlin CET
2015-11-11 22:30 Wed Asia/Calcutta IST
------------------new day----------------------
2015-11-12 01:00 Thu Asia/Singapore SGT
2015-11-12 01:00 Thu Asia/Hong_Kong HKT
2015-11-12 02:00 Thu Asia/Tokyo JST
2015-11-12 03:00 Thu Australia/Brisbane EST
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
= Followups =
#topic #540 Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++
compilation environments.
.fpc 540
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540
#topic #558 Application/Library distinction and package splitting
.fpc 558
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/558
#topic #566 RPM file triggers
.fpc 566
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/566
#topic #567 Packaging Python 3 applications and modules for EPEL 7+
.fpc 567
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/567
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/report/13
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fpc,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until
the following meeting.
8 years, 5 months
Force fedora-review to redownload repo metadata
by Julien Enselme
Hi,
I am trying to do a review of a package which requires dependencies that
landed in rawhide yesterday. My local fedora-review/mock doesn't know
about it yet and so it fails to setup the environment:
No matching package to install: 'python2-h5io'
No matching package to install: 'python2-jdcal'
No matching package to install: 'python3-h5io'
No matching package to install: 'python3-jdcal'
To get rid off the cache manually, I tried:
- rm -rf /var/cache/yum/*
- rm -rf /var/cache/dnf/*
- dnf update --refresh
- rm -rf /var/cache/mock/*
- rm -rf /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64
- mock -r fedora-rawhide-x86_64 --init
To make fedora-review to it, I tried:
- fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1276880 --mock-options
'--clean --scrub=all '
fedora-review -m fedora-rawhide-x86_64 -b 1276880 --mock-options
'--scrub=all '
Is there anyway do to it? It is getting very frustrating.
Regards,
--
Julien Enselme aka Jujens
http://www.jujens.eu/
8 years, 5 months
SELinux packing page example results in fedora-review error
by myk
Hi,
According to
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SELinux_Policy_Modules_Packaging
_Draft
in the "Building the Policy Modules" section the example approach to
build a SELinux policy is:
%build
...
cd SELinux
for selinuxvariant in %{selinux_variants}
do
make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f
/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
mv mymodule.pp mymodule.pp.${selinuxvariant}
make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f
/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile clean
done
So for https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1209166, in
palo.spec in the %build section, I now looking to use:
#Use cmake to build
%cmake ../%{name}-%{version}/
make %{?_smp_mflags}
cd -
#Build the SELinux policy
cd SELinux
for selinuxvariant in %{selinux_variants}
do
make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f
/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile
mv %{name}.pp %{name}.pp.${selinuxvariant}
make NAME=${selinuxvariant} -f
/usr/share/selinux/devel/Makefile clean
done
But, when running fedora-review, I get the error message:
[!]: Uses parallel make %{?_smp_mflags} macro.
I tried to include %{?_smp_mflags} in the SELinux's Makefile make call,
but this always resulted in an error during rpmbuild.
Since the %{?_smp_mflags} is useful, either 'make' needs to accept -j
against the SELinux Makefile (and the SELinux Packaging page updated),
or fedora-review needs to exclude SELinux Makefile lines when testing
for the %{?_smp_mflags}.
As I don't know what would involved in either approach, would like some
guidance on whether filing a bug report against fedora-review is the
most appropriate next step.
Kind regards,
Michael
8 years, 5 months
FPC meeting for 2015-11-05 canceled
by Jason L Tibbitts III
Many folks on the committee will be unavailable tomorrow and there's
only one item of business which needs consideration:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/540
Define gcc and gcc-c++ as providing minimal C and C++ compilation
environments
Since our chances of reaching quorum are low, I'll go ahead and cancel
the meeting. I would urge FPC folks to comment on that ticket if you
have anything to add so they're not waiting too long for input.
- J<
8 years, 5 months
