packaging February 2021

packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org

14 participants
15 discussions

mockbuild: Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)?

by Brad Bell

I am having trouble with mockbuild on rawhide and do not know how to proceed ? First I tried fedpkg mockbuild and got the response Could not execute mockbuild: Could not find the release/dist from branch name rawhide Please specify with --release Then I tried fedpkg --release rawhide and got the same response. Then I checked git show-ref rawhide git show-ref f34 and determined that they were the same. Then I tried fedpkg --release f34 mockbuild and got the response ... snip ... warning: /var/lib/mock/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/root/var/cache/dnf/fedora-2d95c80a1fa0a67d/packages/alternatives-1.15-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm: Header V4 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID 9867c58f: NOKEY fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x45719A39: Userid : "Fedora (34) <fedora-34-primary(a)fedoraproject.org>" Fingerprint: 8C5B A699 0BDB 26E1 9F2A 1A80 1161 AE69 4571 9A39 From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary Key imported successfully fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 GPG key at file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary (0x45719A39) is already installed fedora 1.6 MB/s | 1.6 kB 00:00 Importing GPG key 0x9570FF31: Userid : "Fedora (33) <fedora-33-primary(a)fedoraproject.org>" Fingerprint: 963A 2BEB 0200 9608 FE67 EA42 49FD 7749 9570 FF31 From : /usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-primary Key imported successfully Import of key(s) didn't help, wrong key(s)? Public key for alternatives-1.15-2.fc34.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: alternatives-1.15-2.fc34.x86_64 GPG Keys are configured as: file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-34-primary, file:///usr/share/distribution-gpg-keys/fedora/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-33-primary Public key for audit-libs-3.0.1-1.fc35.x86_64.rpm is not installed. Failing package is: audit-libs-3.0.1-1.fc35.x86_64 ... snip ...

3 years, 2 months

3
3
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-02-18 17:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-02-18 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2021-02-18 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2021-02-18 12:00 EST --> US/Eastern <-- 2021-02-18 17:00 GMT Europe/London 2021-02-18 17:00 UTC UTC 2021-02-18 18:00 CET Europe/Berlin 2021-02-18 18:00 CET Europe/Paris 2021-02-18 22:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2021-02-19 01:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2021-02-19 01:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2021-02-19 02:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2021-02-19 03:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Actions = #topic #pr-814 * mhroncok talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot = Followup Issues = #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 #topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

3 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Summary/Minutes from today's FPC Meeting (2021-02-11 17:00 - 17:25 UTC)

by James Antill

====================== #fedora-meeting-1: fpc ====================== Meeting started by geppetto at 17:01:00 UTC. The full logs are available at https://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2021-02-11/fpc.2021-02... . Meeting summary --------------- * Roll Call (geppetto, 17:01:00) * Schedule (geppetto, 17:09:02) * LINK: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@lists.fedoraproje... (geppetto, 17:09:06) * #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. (geppetto, 17:09:17) * #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. (geppetto, 17:10:24) * LINK: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 (geppetto, 17:10:32) * ACTION: tibbs to rework wording to be clearer and mostly limit to double _'s. (geppetto, 17:13:18) * Open Floor (geppetto, 17:13:35) Meeting ended at 17:25:58 UTC. Action Items ------------ * tibbs to rework wording to be clearer and mostly limit to double _'s. Action Items, by person ----------------------- * tibbs * tibbs to rework wording to be clearer and mostly limit to double _'s. * **UNASSIGNED** * (none) People Present (lines said) --------------------------- * geppetto (32) * zodbot (13) * tibbs (10) * decathorpe (10) * limburgher (2) * ignatenkobrain (1) * carlwgeorge (1) Generated by `MeetBot`_ 0.1.4 .. _`MeetBot`: http://wiki.debian.org/MeetBot

3 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2021-02-11 17:00 UTC)

by James Antill

Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC meeting Thursday at 2021-02-11 17:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on irc.freenode.net. Local time information (via. uitime): ================= Day: Thursday ================== 2021-02-11 09:00 PST US/Pacific 2021-02-11 12:00 EST --> US/Eastern <-- 2021-02-11 17:00 GMT Europe/London 2021-02-11 17:00 UTC UTC 2021-02-11 18:00 CET Europe/Berlin 2021-02-11 18:00 CET Europe/Paris 2021-02-11 22:30 IST Asia/Calcutta ---------------- New Day: Friday ----------------- 2021-02-12 01:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong 2021-02-12 01:00 +08 Asia/Singapore 2021-02-12 02:00 JST Asia/Tokyo 2021-02-12 03:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane Links to all tickets below can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting = Followup Actions = #topic #pr-814 * mhroncok talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot #topic Open Floor * decathorpe look through non-meeting tickets, see if any are stuck/need to be discussed = Followup Issues = #topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable? .fpc 907 https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907 = Followup Pull Requests = #topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814 = Pull Requests = #topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores. https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045 = Open Floor = For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The report of the agenda items can be found at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can: * Reply to this e-mail * File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee * E-mail me directly * Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.

3 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

Re: Stale provenpackagers to be removed from group

by Brad Bell

I build a new upstream source for the package I maintain during January of each year, instead of once every six months. Currently I only submit other builds when a problem arises (with my package) during the production engineering builds a the new release of Fedora. (Each build of my package automatically does extensive testing). In accordance with the new policy, should I submit a build with not real changes for each release of Fedora ? On 2/10/21 8:44 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: > In accordance with the new FESCo policy[1] the following > provenpackagers will be submitted for removal in two weeks based on a > lack of builds submitted in the last six months. If you received this > directly, you can reply off-list to indicate you believe you should > still have provenpackager status. > > This is the first time we have done a regular audit of the > provenpackagers group, so please be patient with any hiccups in the > process. This will be done regularly at the branch point in each > release. > ... snip ...

3 years, 2 months

2
1
0 / 0

← Newer
1
2
Older →

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

2006

2005

packaging February 2021