Automatic virtual provides for RPM macros?
by Miro Hrončok
Hello,
today at Nest, somebody said "unfortunately, there is no way to tell what
package to install to get a particular RPM macro".
I think that having an RPM provides generator for "rpm-macro(__python3)" or
similar should be a fairly simple exercise.
Would you folks consider that useful?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
1 year, 1 month
- 4
- 4
RPM-level auto release and changelog bumping - Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal
by Ben Cotton
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/rpm_level_auto_release_and_changel...
== Summary ==
redhat-rpm-config will be updated so users of the auto framework get
automated release and changelog bumping.
== Owner ==
* Name: [[User:nim| Nicolas Mailhot]]
* Email: <nicolas.mailhot at laposte.net>
== Detailed Description ==
This is a system-wide change because all packages build with
redhat-rpm-config, but it only concerns packages that opted to use
this part of redhat-rpm-config (auto framework).
The change will make those packages auto-bump and auto-changelog at
the rpm level, in an infrastructure-independent way.
== Benefit to Fedora ==
Autobumping removes a huge packager shore and makes timestamping in
changelogs more reliable.
== Scope ==
* Proposal owners: The feature is coded and works at the rpm level.
Unfortunately, mock filters away the srpms containing the bump state,
so it does not work in upper layers.
* Other developers: The feature requires buy-in by mock developers
(and probably koji developers) to lift the restrictions that block it
above the rpm level. Also, it requires a mechanism to pass the user
name and email that will be used in bumped changelogs (defining two
variables in ~/.rpmmacros is sufficient at rpm level)
* Mock issue: https://github.com/rpm-software-management/mock/issues/599
* Release engineering: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9567
* Policies and guidelines: maybe eventually if things work out on the
technical level
* FPC issue: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/998
* Trademark approval: N/A (not needed for this Change)
== Upgrade/compatibility impact ==
This is a pure build tooling update, it changes how things are built
not what is built.
== How To Test ==
A redhat-rpm-config packages with the changes and some example
packages are available in
https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/nim/refactoring-forge-patches-aut...
Since the mock/copr layer is currently blocking the feature, you need
to install the redhat-rpm-config and forge macro packages available in
this repo locally. Afterwards you can take any of the example packages
in the repo and rebuild them with rpmbuild -ba to your heart content,
and see the releases bump and the changelogs being updated
accordingly.
To get beautiful changelogs, you also need to add
<pre>
%buildsys_name Your name
%buildsys_email Your email
</pre>
in ~/.rpmmacros
== User Experience ==
N/A Packager experience change only
== Dependencies ==
The change is a spin-off of
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Patches_in_Forge_macros_-_Auto_mac...
Therefore, it depends on the success of that other change and will
probably need rebasing if the code in this other change evolves during
the redhat-rpm-config merge.
It also depends on mock / copr/ koji buy-in and changes, that may add
their own requirements.
== Contingency Plan ==
There is no contingency plan because the change will happen or not at all.
== Documentation ==
There is as much documentation as the average redhat-rpm-config change
(ie comments in the macro files themselves)
== Release Notes ==
N/A Packager productivity change only
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
1 year, 8 months
- 12
- 23
Schedule for Thursday's FPC Meeting (2022-04-07 16:00 UTC)
by James Antill
Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FPC
meeting Thursday at 2022-04-07 16:00 UTC in #fedora-meeting-1 on
irc.libera.chat.
Local time information (via. uitime):
================= Day: Thursday ==================
2022-04-07 09:00 PDT US/Pacific
2022-04-07 12:00 EDT --> US/Eastern <--
2022-04-07 16:00 UTC UTC
2022-04-07 17:00 BST Europe/London
2022-04-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Berlin
2022-04-07 18:00 CEST Europe/Paris
2022-04-07 21:30 IST Asia/Calcutta
---------------- New Day: Friday -----------------
2022-04-08 00:00 HKT Asia/Hong_Kong
2022-04-08 00:00 +08 Asia/Singapore
2022-04-08 01:00 JST Asia/Tokyo
2022-04-08 02:00 AEST Australia/Brisbane
Links to all tickets below can be found at:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
= Followup Actions =
#topic #pr-814
* mhroncok
talk to authors again, having a working example might help a lot
= Followup Issues =
#topic #886 Enable BRP for detecting RPATH
.fpc 886
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/886
#topic #907 Which %__foo macros for executables are acceptable?
.fpc 907
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/907
#topic #1058 How to handle %lang files in package owned directories? .fpc 1058
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1058
#topic #1132 Mark comments as scriplets for Sources (automation)
.fpc 1132
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1132
#topic #1150 request for clarification wrt. base version / compat package naming
.fpc 1150
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1150
#topic #1159 Ban use of %configure in %prep
.fpc 1159
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issue/1159
= Followup Pull Requests =
#topic #pr-814 Add SELinux Independent Policy Guidelines.
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/814
#topic #pr-1045 WIP: Add discussion of macro names beginning with underscores.
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1045
#topic #pr-1071 Overhaul the RPATH section of the guidelines.
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1071
#topic #pr-1097 Use caret in Obsoletes to simplify
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1097
#topic #pr-1163 Sources: Add section about conditionalization
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/pull-request/1163
= Open Floor =
For more complete details, please visit each individual ticket. The
report of the agenda items can be found at:
https://pagure.io/packaging-committee/issues?status=Open&tags=meeting
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can:
* Reply to this e-mail
* File a new ticket at: https://pagure.io/packaging-committee
* E-mail me directly
* Bring it up at the end of the meeting, during the open floor topic. Note
that added topics may be deferred until the following meeting.
2 years
- 1
- 0
rpmbuild: `! true` does not fail %install, but `false` does, `! true` fails other sections
by Miro Hrončok
Hello folks,
I've realized that if the %install section contains a command that reverses the
exit code from success to failure via !, the build does not fail, but it
proceeds. In other sections, the build fails. E.g. this:
%install
! true
Does not fail the build.
But this does:
%install
false
As well as this:
%build
! true
Any idea why this is happening? Is it a bug, or a feature? This happens on
Fedora 35 locally as well as Rawhide in Koji/mock.
All of the following (applied separately) fail the RPM build:
%prep
false
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.A1K5K0
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ false
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.A1K5K0 (%prep)
%build
false
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YR6FiX
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ false
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.YR6FiX (%build)
%install
false
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OapPfB
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64 '!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
++ dirname /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ mkdir -p /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
+ mkdir /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ false
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.OapPfB (%install)
%check
false
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CnEWIO
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ false
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.CnEWIO (%check)
But when replaced with `! true`, %install (and %install only) succeeds:
%prep
! true
Executing(%prep): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ojDvj8
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ true
+ RPM_EC=1
++ jobs -p
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.ojDvj8 (%prep)
%build
! true
Executing(%build): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RTiQQH
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ true
+ RPM_EC=1
++ jobs -p
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RTiQQH (%build)
%install
! true
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.RczM4N
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64 '!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
++ dirname /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ mkdir -p /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
+ mkdir /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ true
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
+ ...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
Executing(%check): ...
Or even:
%install
! true
echo UNREACHABLE
Executing(%install): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.nzrs6N
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ '[' /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64 '!=' / ']'
+ rm -rf /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
++ dirname /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ mkdir -p /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT
+ mkdir /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILDROOT/reproducer-0-0.x86_64
+ true
+ echo UNREACHABLE
UNREACHABLE
+ /usr/lib/rpm/check-buildroot
+ ...
+ /usr/lib/rpm/redhat/brp-python-hardlink
Executing(%check): ...
%check
! true
Executing(%check): /bin/sh -e /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4E9WU3
+ umask 022
+ cd /home/churchyard/rpmbuild/BUILD
+ true
+ RPM_EC=1
++ jobs -p
+ exit 1
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.4E9WU3 (%check)
What sorcery is this?
--
Miro Hrončok
--
Phone: +420777974800
IRC: mhroncok
2 years
- 4
- 4
- ← Newer
- 1
- Older →