-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Nigel Jones wrote:
Hi everyone,
While putting in a couple of packages for Extras Review I've stumbled
into a couple of issues regarding how Ocaml links libraries and how the
Fedora Packaging Guidelines are set.
My packages in question are:
ocamlSDL (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235804)
camlimages (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235805)
freetennis (
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235815)
Basically, ocamlSDL and camlimages produce two sets of libraries (a set
of dynamic libraries, and another set for development etc), sadly when
other packages like freetennis build, they staticly link to libraries
such as camlimages/ocamlSDL.
I found it semi-suspect when I built freetennis, and hence why I asked
on bugzilla when I posted the three packages for review, however I did
some more questioning today and after a quick IRC discussion in #ocaml
was told:
12/04 13:39 < G> hmmm, .a .cma and .cmxa are all static ocaml libraries
right?
12/04 13:44 < Smerdyakov> Those are the two library extensions, yes.
12/04 13:44 < Smerdyakov> Native code OCaml doesn't support dynamic loading.
12/04 13:44 < Smerdyakov> I expect that bytecode uses the same files for
dynamic loading as static loading.
Looking at my installed files on my laptop, lablgl, lablgtk and labltk
(as well as the main ocaml package) store .a, .cma and .cmxa files in
/usr/lib/ocaml (and subfolders).
As I'm only new to Fedora packaging, could someone please advise on
where I should from here on the matter and what the position of FESCO is
on Ocaml static libraries, and where I should go from here.
Thanks,
Nigel Jones
I'm just wondering if anyone has any thoughts on this issue.
I've talked to some more people in #ocaml (Freenode), who suggested that
I try a patch by the name of 'scaml' which is a year or two old (and
although can be manually applied to the ocaml source, it does not work
(problems with assembly which I've not comfortable meddling with).
We'd actually need to downgrade to 3.07 which was removed from Fedora in
Feb 05 to get the patch working to satisfy the need for dynamic loading
which I'm sure would upset a few people.
Upstream already have a bug opened stating that they need to fix the
issue but they have never updated it, or assigned it to anyone.
So my main question is "where to from here?"
Thanks,
Nigel Jones
- --
Fedora-packaging mailing list
Fedora-packaging(a)redhat.com
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-packaging
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFGIhIjpldg9bRmG6kRAmNWAJ9J9Is75ecQOMoxvJgMtkrahJr76wCfVmEo
ut46/8ZGBkzCJCrRHyywwTQ=
=6wVo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----