A quick check indicates that ALL <admon/...> blocks are simply gone, see
e.g. missing block in cron jobs section [1][2] or all the examples in
crypto-policies [3][4].
That is a lot of crucial information missing, unfortunately.
Christopher
[1]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CronFiles/#_cron_job_file_names
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CronFiles#Cron_job_file_names
[3]
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/CryptoPolicies/#_cc_applications
[4]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:CryptoPolicies#C.2FC.2B.2B_applications
On 7/25/2019 6:00 PM, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Le jeudi 25 juillet 2019 à 10:16 -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III a écrit :
>> Thank you for pointing this out. Looking at the initial conversion
>> of
>> that page from the wiki into git
>> (commit8a2c101fb5677dca34e764208893b34daee753bc from 2018-09-21 ,
>> that
>> admon block simply isn't there. I do not know why, as it seems to
>> have
>> been in the wiki page source at the time (added in 2013).
>
> Asciidoc convertion of admon blocks was bungled.
>
> I'm working right now on another guideline part where the central
> concept, that was in an important admon block was just replaced with
> empty lines.
>
> Since I'm rewriting the page now, and intend to push the result soonish
> to FPC, I won’t fix the conversion, but I wonder how many Fedora
> guidelines have been purged of important parts.
>
--
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.