On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:58:39PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
On Mon, 2008-07-21 at 17:45 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 21, 2008 at 12:01:36PM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
> > The Fedora Board was asked to determine whether including MinGW bits was
> > a good idea. They said that it was, but that it should be separated from
> > the main Fedora repository, and that FESCo should determine the
> > specifics. (see:
> >
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/Meetings/2008-07-15)
>
> This meeting wasn't announced in the normal way (by a posting "Plan
> for tomorrows (DATE) ..." on fedora-devel-list), there are no IRC logs
> anywhere, no one asked anyone in the MinGW SIG to attend (and so they
> weren't there) and all we have is this fait-accompli message after the
> fact ...
The Board meets (usually) every week on Tuesday. One meeting a month,
that meeting is public (IRC):
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Board/
This particular meeting was not public, thus, no one other than Board
members were invited.
And IRC logs of this meeting ...?
I notice people were at the meeting who aren't in FESCo. OK, maybe
technically they just happened to be there and weren't "invited", but
I think it's in the interests of everyone to find out who said what,
in the open.
Rich.
--
Richard Jones, Emerging Technologies, Red Hat
http://et.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my OCaml programming blog:
http://camltastic.blogspot.com/
Fedora now supports 59 OCaml packages (the OPEN alternative to F#)
http://cocan.org/getting_started_with_ocaml_on_red_hat_and_fedora