On Wed, Jun 29, 2005 at 09:49:44PM +0300, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> Also, how to deal with smp/hugemem? Separate
kernel-module-smp-%{name} and
> kernel-module-hugemem-%{name} subpackages?
> (Or is that kernel-smp-module, to match kernel-smp-devel?)
None of the above; the variant is included in %{kver}, which is the
output of "uname -r" for the target kernel.
Oh; duh.
In the case of openafs, that requires some more hackery to figure out if
we're supposed to be giving the options for an smp build. But I suspect this
*way* falls into the category of "openafs is a weird bad example case".
--
Matthew Miller mattdm(a)mattdm.org <
http://www.mattdm.org/>
Boston University Linux ------> <
http://linux.bu.edu/>
Current office temperature: 78 degrees Fahrenheit.