On Tue, Jun 19, 2012 at 3:24 AM, Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
I have a couple of questions regarding the new feature just approved,
in particular regarding the "scope" section:
If it helps, this feature actually wasn't approved - which is why it's
been moved to the FeaturePageIncomplete category.
The FESCo ticket can be seen here:
https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/ticket/872
And minutes/logs from the fesco meeting are here:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/meetingminutes/2012-June/000234....
There is some guidance from fesco for the feature owner to work with
the FPC on new guidelines.
That said - someone may still find it interesting to answer your
questions (or you may have better luck on the discussion tab of the
wiki page,
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/Systemd-unit-cleanup
) -- but I just wanted to point out that it was *not* approved as a
feature in yesterday's meeting.
-Robyn
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Systemd-unit-cleanup#Scope
1) Change PIDFile=/var/run/foo fields to point to PIDFile=/run/foo instead
Is there a rpm macro for the "/run" directory? I was using
"--with-pid-dir=%{_localstatedir}/run" in a SPEC file for %configure.
Maybe there's something similar already declared into the expansion of
%configure for Fedora 18?
What should I do if the pid directory is specified into the
configuration file of the daemon I'm mantaining?
Can the user still run with its own config upon successful upgrade to Fedora 18?
2) Remove various entries in units which are no longer necessary since
they are systemd defaults for unit simplification
Where can I get such list? (Git, wiki pages, man pages)
Thanks & regards,
--Simone
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose
sight of the shore (R. W. Emerson).
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging