Quoting Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com>:
> On Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:14:42 +0100, pavel(a)zhukoff.net wrote:
>
>> Hi packagers,
>>
>> If you have package with separate -doc subpackage and the subpackage
>> contains files
>> from %{buildroot} (compiled documentation or so on) you're probably
>> interesting in.
>> For some reasons (I *think* it is a regression after last switching to
>> unversioned docs)
>> rpm packages doc directory twice without any reasons (and does it even
>> if main package doesn't contain any references to
>> %doc or %{_docdir} at all!)
>
> See:
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/338
Thank you for the link. from the case:
>>> With the unversioned docdir in Fedora 20, the %doc line will
>>> include the full %{_docdir}/%{name} tree in the base package,
>>> regardless of which local doc files are specified in that line.
BUT:
SPEC:
%files
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}
%dir %{_libdir}/%{name}/relocatable
%{_libdir}/lib%{name}*.so.%{version}
%{_libdir}/%{name}/relocatable/lib%{name}*.so.%{version}
and result:
rpm -qpl RPMS/x86_64/aws-3.1.0-3.fc20.x86_64.rpm | grep share/doc | wc -l
94
Ah no. Please forget my last comment. Wrong build number.
> --
> packaging mailing list
> packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging