On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 11:54:15AM +0200, Matthias Saou wrote:
Axel Thimm wrote :
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2007 at 02:06:52PM -0400, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Friday 06 April 2007 13:52:12 Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > I would recommend at least one rebuild of a package just before release
> > > though for everything but pure data packages. I've been surprised by
> > > what has changed and caused failures.
> >
> > Continuous rebuilds are done, just not imported. I think this is great, we
> > get the benefit without the churn. Churning the entire package set without
> > reason is ridiculous and may do more harm than good. See Matt D's
> > core/extras rebuild reports.
>
> But nobody tests them. Only fatal build errors are probed that way.
IIRC this is not true : A rebuild is also considered "failed" if it
creates packages with different requires or provides than the ones from
the packages in the repository.
So, if the build generates the same sonames, it is already considered
run-time tested?
--
Axel.Thimm at
ATrpms.net