On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 23:33:02 +0200
Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, 5 Aug 2011 12:34:47 -0400
David Michael wrote:
> Is it appropriate to support any/all applications listed in the
> install.rdf, even if they are not available in Fedora? (I don't
> see a downside to this if the draft guidelines are followed, and it
> would allow locally managed applications to take advantage of
> extensions installed from RPMs.)
I would do so, if the applications are free and have a chance of
beeing in fedora in the future (some extra symlinks don't need any
relevant space).
Better support that applications, you want to support ;)
I haven't heard anything of "Fennec" or "E Music" till looking
into the
install.rdf right now. I'll just support seamonkey and firefox till
there is a feature request for anything else...
Thanks,
Tom