[Fedora-packaging] Re: Guidelines: Should numbered patches be replaced by unnumbered in most of our examples?

Hello, I've recently finally watched *Still packaging like it's 1999?* from DevConf.CZ 2020 by Florian Festi.

One thing that I've learned is that for many years now, we can do: Patch:          foo.patch Patch:          bar.patch Patch:          baz.patch Instead of the more traditional: Patch1:         foo.patch Patch2:         bar.patch Patch3:         baz.patch The same applies to sources. Should we adapt our examples in the packaging guidelines to prefer this approach unless the patches/sources need to be referenced by their number in %prep? It seems simpler. It has been supported since RPM 4.15 (hence not yet on RHEL 8).