On Wed, Jan 12, 2022 at 08:59:30PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
Hello,
I've recently finally watched *Still packaging like it's 1999?* from
DevConf.CZ 2020 by Florian Festi.
One thing that I've learned is that for many years now, we can do:
Patch: foo.patch
Patch: bar.patch
Patch: baz.patch
Definitely.
Zbyszek
> Instead of the more traditional:
>
>
> Patch1: foo.patch
> Patch2: bar.patch
> Patch3: baz.patch
>
> The same applies to sources.
>
> Should we adapt our examples in the packaging guidelines to prefer this
> approach unless the patches/sources need to be referenced by their number in
> %prep? It seems simpler.
>
> It has been supported since RPM 4.15 (hence not yet on RHEL 8).