On Mon, Oct 01, 2012 at 20:25:31 +0200,
Michael Schwendt <mschwendt(a)gmail.com> wrote:
IMO, it's leading nowhere if you're reading inbetween the lines. I fail
to see why we would ship something "heavily patented".
One might think that using pristine sources in the source rpm is better
than using one with the patented code stripped out. And it isn't clear the
patents are violated if the code is shipped in an srpm, but is not in the
binaries we ship.