Panu Matilainen wrote:
A name is just a name, there's no functional difference. Once
upon a
time in a faraway galaxy there might have been, but that's nothing you
need to worry about. These days its just a naming convention, albeit a
rather blurry one.
The bottom line: as long as your macros are "namespaced" (such as your
GNAT/_GNAT prefix) to limit the possibility of clashes with others,
you're technically free to call them whatever you want. Following
existing conventions is not a bad idea though.
OK, one problem less to worry about. Thanks!
Björn Persson