Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 18:03 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 08/23/2010 05:51 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
Le lundi 23 août 2010 à 17:48 +0200, Ralf Corsepius a écrit :
On 08/23/2010 03:30 PM, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On 08/20/2010 08:35 PM, Jonathan MERCIER wrote:
hello, i have do a ticket https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/7 since 3 week and i wait always!
Jonathan,
We're working on your ticket. :)
One question that I have for you is this:
In your template, you do not use %{d_libdir}. Why not? It seems to conflict with the rest of your draft.
Slightly related to this question:
Why do you need %{d_libdir} rsp. why isn't %{libdir} sufficent?
Ralf
-- packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
because for feet with other distribution like debian ubuntu ... i put header file in /usr/include/d
d_includedir makes sense (header), but libraries?
d_libdir only makes sense if the libraries being produced by "D" are incompatible to GNU/Linux system library file format conventions.
Or conversely: The language a library in %libdir is being implemented in, should be irrelevant.
Ralf
oh sorry i read too quicly last time. I use _d_libdir for file /etc/ldc.conf who need D lib path