Ralf Corsepius wrote:
On Wed, 2006-07-19 at 16:15 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 08:54:22AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Axel Thimm wrote:
> > > Two independent reviewer considered this a blocker for
a
> > > review's acceptance (even though it's marked
"preferred").
> > The reviewers need to be whacked with a clue-stick. A
working
> > (non-broken) buildroot is *not* a blocker.
The point you seem to be missing, your buildroot is broken:
buildroot: %{_tmppath}/%{name}-%{version}-%{release}-root
And you missed the point that *in the context of Fedora Extras*, it's not
broken.
-- Rex