26 Feb
2005
26 Feb
'05
10:19 a.m.
On Sat, 2005-02-26 at 11:24 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
- Look on the fedora-packaging list for the discussion
- my guess is:
a. if the fedora.us package had a non-zero epoch it needs to be maintained - just so users have an upgrade path b. if the fedora.us package had an Epoch: 0 drop it and remove %{epoch} from anyplace you have it in ver strings.
I agree with this. Anyone else have thoughts?
~spot --- Tom "spot" Callaway: Red Hat Sales Engineer || GPG Fingerprint: 93054260 Fedora Extras Steering Committee Member (RPM Standards and Practices) Aurora Linux Project Leader: http://auroralinux.org Lemurs, llamas, and sparcs, oh my!