On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:54 -0500, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2008-02-26 at 13:49 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Bill Nottingham (notting(a)redhat.com) said:
> > The biggest issue I could see is that any issues in handling such a package
> > would need to be fixed *everywhere* that package is deployed, whether it
> > be current Fedora, earlier Fedora, or EPEL. It may not be practical to
> > deploy such fixes everywhere.
To me, these are the least issues. They are
of a technical nature and
can be overcome/fixed (utf-8)
My concern is usability of the distro.
IMO, we can not avoid to restrict certain aspects of the distro to the
least common denominator. Package-names are such a case.
> Consider, for example, that such a package breaks bugzilla.
Although I
> suppose that's one way to avoid getting bug reports.
>
/me renames yum to ᶨᶬⱴ
Is this Farsi, Arab or Hebrew?
Proposal: Let's rename the bodhi and koji packages + their primary
executables into their Indian rsp. Japanese equivalents :)
Ralf