Gesendet: Dienstag, 24. Juni 2014 um 11:45 Uhr Von: "Paul Howarth" <paul(a)city-fan.org&gt; An: packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org Betreff: Re: [Fedora-packaging] question regarding the release tag of speed-dreams 2.1.0rc1-r5781 new rc1 release On 24/06/14 09:04, Martin Gansser wrote: > Hi, > can someone have a look on to the attached rpm spec file, is the > release tag ok for the new > rc1 release. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines > Erstellt: > /home/martin/rpmbuild/SRPMS/speed-dreams-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.src.rpm > Erstellt: > /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm > Erstellt: > /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/noarch/speed-dreams-robots-base-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.noarch.rpm > Erstellt: > /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-devel-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm > Erstellt: > /home/martin/rpmbuild/RPMS/x86_64/speed-dreams-debuginfo-2.1.0-17.r5781_rc1.fc20.x86_64.rpm > the rpm spec file is attached. No, you have a release tag starting with "17.", whilst pre-release versions should start with "0." - see the pre-release naming guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_pack... /wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Pre-Release_packages] If you want to include the svn revision number then you should also follow the snapshot guidelines: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_package... /wiki/Packaging:NamingGuidelines#Snapshot_packages] You probably want something like 2.1.0-0.17.rc1 or 2.1.0-0.17.20140619svn5781.rc1 However, if you have previously built a 2.1.0 pre-release with a non-zero release number, using the zero prefix would break the upgrade path so you'd have to consider either continuing with guidelines-breaking release numbers or using an epoch. Paul.