On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 11:50 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
On Thu, 2008-12-18 at 17:36 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Wouldn't it be better to let rpm set _libdir/_lib to match noarch
> package requirements?
What should it set it to? It has no knowledge of where the noarch rpm
package will eventually be installed.
It has. In case of noarch _lib always is the
"default", which normally
Should we assume that /usr/lib is
always correct (how Debian of me to even suggest this)?
In case of noarch, yes.
Because an arch'aware (e.g. lib vs. lib64) _lib/_libdir qualifies a
package as "arch'ed"