On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 05:57:35PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 10:34:14AM -0400, Tom spot Callaway wrote:
>> We probably should make sure that everything in the release criteria is
>> covered in the Packaging Guidelines.
> I am not sure that it primarily belongs there. Well, broken
> dependencies could be in the guidelines, like 'all the package requires
> and buildrequires
> should be satisfied by packages in the corresponding fedora release', but
> broken EVR paths mostly make sense for updates.
Wrong - They do not make sense! They are critical bugs that need to be
Sure, but they can only be introduced during updates, not during the
So, there could be a guideline, but it should (also) be linked from the
update policy, since it is the place where broken EVR enters.