2:41 p.m.
Hello,
I'm currently facing an issue with my fedora account.
I would like to add new python packages to Fedora.
So I followed the process for my package
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
The package was approved.
At the SCM step, I flagged my ticket with the "fedora-cvs=?" but
unfortunately it was refused because my account seems not part of the
Packager group.
My account name is "uggla".
Everything (status, cla, etc...) seems ok on the Fedora account web page.
There is nothing listed at the "things to do" page.
Looking at the "join a group" section, I have not the "join button"
in
front of the Packager group allowing me to do it.
I had opened my account and submitted packages several years ago but didn't
use it for a long time, maybe this is the root cause of the issue.
Right now I'm stuck with this problem. Please, could someone help/advice me
to unlock this situation ?
Best regards.
René
3:15 p.m.
>>>> "RR" == René Ribaud
<rene.ribaud(a)gmail.com> writes:
RR> I would like to add new python packages to Fedora. So I followed
RR> the process for my package
RR> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1258405
If you're not a current packager, a sponsor must do your first review.
Looking at the ticket history, I don't see that the ticket was ever
marked to indicate that a sponsor is required.
The bit it appears that you missed is at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Cr...
(Yes, there are too many steps on that page. There's an application in
development to simplify this process.)
RR> The package was approved.
But by someone who shouldn't have reviewed it, and who cannot give you
access to the packager group.
RR> Looking at the "join a group" section, I have not the "join
button"
RR> in front of the Packager group allowing me to do it.
That's because you cannot join the packager group yourself; a sponsor
must add you to it.
- J<
3:17 p.m.
I should add that if I had the time at the moment I'd go over the review
and sponsor you myself, but I just don't. Hopefully another sponsor can
take a look.
- J<
6:56 p.m.
Hello,
Thanks for your quick answer.
To be honest, I thought that I didn't need a sponsor because I already had
done that step previously (quite a long time ago :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567).
Sorry If I did something wrong that was not wished. That will be great if a
sponsor could help me to fix that.
I have also opened other tickets for new packages, will they need to be
reviewed by a sponsor as well ?
Best regards.
René.
2015-09-16 22:17 GMT+02:00 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>:
I should add that if I had the time at the moment I'd go over the
review
and sponsor you myself, but I just don't. Hopefully another sponsor can
take a look.
- J<
8:42 p.m.
Wait, if you've already been sponsored and have a package in dist-git, you
should be in the packagers group. What's going on here?
On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 7:56 PM, René Ribaud <rene.ribaud(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Hello,
Thanks for your quick answer.
To be honest, I thought that I didn't need a sponsor because I already had
done that step previously (quite a long time ago :
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=564567).
Sorry If I did something wrong that was not wished. That will be great if
a sponsor could help me to fix that.
I have also opened other tickets for new packages, will they need to be
reviewed by a sponsor as well ?
Best regards.
René.
2015-09-16 22:17 GMT+02:00 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>:
> I should add that if I had the time at the moment I'd go over the review
> and sponsor you myself, but I just don't. Hopefully another sponsor can
> take a look.
>
> - J<
>
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
--
真実はいつも一つ！/ Always, there's only one truth!
8:46 p.m.
On 9/17/15, Neal Gompa <ngompa13(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Wait, if you've already been sponsored and have a package in
dist-git, you
should be in the packagers group. What's going on here?
Revoked due to inactivity.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://awk.io
8:51 p.m.
>>>> "CM" == Christopher Meng <i(a)cicku.me>
writes:
CM> Revoked due to inactivity.
That's not something we've done in the past. At worst the account would
have been disabled but that's not the case here. Do you have any
pointers to a discussion about this?
Anyway, I've re-done the sponsorship thing.
- J<
9:22 p.m.
>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts
<tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> writes:
JLT> That's not something we've done in the past.
OK, so I was wrong. There was one incident four years ago when we
required that all users change their passwords and upload fresh SSH
keys. (And obviously my memory doesn't store much data for four years.)
After about six weeks, if someone took no action then they were removed
from some sensitive groups.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-October/003005.html
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-November/003017.html
The intent was always for folks to get their access back if they
returned (and set up new passwords and keys).
- J<
9:30 p.m.
On Thu, Sep 17, 2015 at 10:22 AM, Jason L Tibbitts III
<tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> wrote:
>>>>> "JLT" == Jason L Tibbitts
<tibbs(a)math.uh.edu> writes:
JLT> That's not something we've done in the past.
OK, so I was wrong. There was one incident four years ago when we
required that all users change their passwords and upload fresh SSH
keys. (And obviously my memory doesn't store much data for four years.)
After about six weeks, if someone took no action then they were removed
from some sensitive groups.
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-October/003005.html
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/announce/2011-November/003017.html
The intent was always for folks to get their access back if they
returned (and set up new passwords and keys).
Yes, I still have that email in archive. But not sure if it's the cause.
--
Yours sincerely,
Christopher Meng
http://cicku.me
8:49 p.m.
>>>> "NG" == Neal Gompa
<ngompa13(a)gmail.com> writes:
NG> What's going on here?
I've no clue, but since somehow that package made it all the way through
the system and was imported. If sponsorship didn't happen then I've no
idea. The gwaei package has been retired for some time now.
Anyway, I've fixed things. (At least I hope I have.) René, go ahead
and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag and proceed with the process.
- J<
4:22 a.m.
I would like to thank everybody for the provided help and especially Jason.
I have received mail saying that I should be part of the packager group.
I will request again the SCM part and I'll keep you posted if something
wrong will happen again, hopefully not.
2015-09-17 3:49 GMT+02:00 Jason L Tibbitts III <tibbs(a)math.uh.edu>:
>>>>> "NG" == Neal Gompa
<ngompa13(a)gmail.com> writes:
NG> What's going on here?
I've no clue, but since somehow that package made it all the way through
the system and was imported. If sponsorship didn't happen then I've no
idea. The gwaei package has been retired for some time now.
Anyway, I've fixed things. (At least I hope I have.) René, go ahead
and re-raise the fedora-cvs flag and proceed with the process.
- J<
--
packaging mailing list
packaging(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
3138
days inactive
3139
days old
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org
10 comments
4 participants
participants (4)
-
Christopher Meng -
Jason L Tibbitts III -
Neal Gompa -
René Ribaud