On Sat, 15 Sep 2012 16:20:54 -0500, Rex Dieter wrote: > Was about to comment on a review that > BuildRequires: glibc-devel > isn't needed and was in the list of exceptions, and was to link the list > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Exceptions_2 > only to discover it indeed is not there. > > Shouldn't it be? > > A Similar argument could probably be made for libstdc++-devel It hasn't come up often enough over the past years. The guidelines say: | There is no need to include the following packages | or their dependencies ... ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^