On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 11:54 +0200, Gianluca Sforna wrote:
It seems we lack any guideline about packaging these, which is not
that bad considering I could only find another cartridge in the repos,
postigis.
However, I'd like to hear your opinion about how to name the
subpackage; I guess candidates would be:
1- postgresql-rdkit
2- rdkit-postgresql
3- rdkit-pgsql
right now I'm leaning toward 1- given that I found many instances of
3-style packages providing optional pgsql support for "name" and 2- is
not very different from 3-
Please use (2). 1 is used for PostgreSQL's core packages or core related
packages. 2nd one is used for extensions, which is appropriate for what
you say.
Your Upstream Packager,
--
Devrim GÜNDÜZ
PostgreSQL Danışmanı/Consultant, Red Hat Certified Engineer
PostgreSQL RPM Repository:
http://yum.pgrpms.org
Community:
devrim~PostgreSQL.org, devrim.gunduz~linux.org.tr
http://www.gunduz.org Twitter:
http://twitter.com/devrimgunduz