Hi everyone,
I'm about to package Tine 2.0 (http://www.tine20.org/) and almost have a package ready for review. One open issue I would like to clarify in advance is, if I should consider the ZendFramework for PHP a library which should not be bundled according to [1]?
At present the package is shipping it's own copy of the ZendFramework as delivered with the original Tine 2.0 tarball, but I could remove that and require the php-ZendFramework package instead.
Please let me know what you think about this.
Best Regards, Dominic
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
Hi everyone,
I'm about to package Tine 2.0 (http://www.tine20.org/) and almost have a package ready for review. One open issue I would like to clarify in advance is, if I should consider the ZendFramework for PHP a library which should not be bundled according to [1]?
At present the package is shipping it's own copy of the ZendFramework as delivered with the original Tine 2.0 tarball, but I could remove that and require the php-ZendFramework package instead.
Please let me know what you think about this.
Yes, Zend would be considered a bundled library in this case, stript it out, Require and use the system version.
-J
Best Regards, Dominic
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
-- Dominic Hopf http://dominichopf.de/
Key Fingerprint: A7DF C4FC 07AE 4DDC 5CA0 BD93 AAB0 6019 CA7D 868D
packaging mailing list packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/packaging
Am Dienstag, den 15.11.2011, 13:38 -0600 schrieb Jon Ciesla:
Yes, Zend would be considered a bundled library in this case, stript it out, Require and use the system version.
Thanks very much for your prompt reply Jon! :)
Regards, Dominic
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org