Hi list, Few months ago I have add a review for Xgl, without success at this time. Considering that fglrx driver still not support AIGLX, this package is useful for most of the fedora Desktop users. The specfile follow the packaging guide line, and seem to be clean. The only blocker that stay is "howto start Xgl". The goal of this mail, is to know which of the two solutions you preferred and why. Have try to sum the (+/-) of each solution, if there is other coolstuff/limitation/problem of one of them, it should be useful to know too. In advance, Thanks. Alphonse Start Xgl from GDM (session menu) --------------------------------- (+) The login time is shorter (last Xorg improvement) (+) Can choice a X type before login (-) Traditionally X is started on the display :0, but that is not possible if we start Xgl from GDM (dislay :0 should already used by GDM) (-) There are 3 log files for X (Xorg.0.log, Xorg.1.log and Xorg.93.log) that should appear strange for the end user. (-) For each WM available available on fedora, we needs a .desktop file (GDM session menu can quickly look too long) (-) two X are loaded at boot time + 1 if rgbd is used (graphical boot). Try it : http://files.damaestro.us/xgl/Xgl-settings-0.1-3.fc6.noarch.rpm Start GDM with Xgl ------------------ (+) do not have any of (-) thing of the first solution. (-) The only thing that I see is that the login take more time between the username input and the password input. Try it: http://download.tuxfamily.org/fedoraxgl/6/i386/system-config-xselector-0.... --- REVIEW BZ: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=192436 SPEC: http://download.tuxfamily.org/fedoraxgl/SPECS/xorg-x11-server-Xgl.spec SRPM: http://download.tuxfamily.org/fedoraxgl/SRPMS/xorg-x11-server-Xgl-0-0.4.2...