Hello,
I created the review request for the bacula-docs spin-off package, but
nobody seems to be taking care of it.
As this is my first review I'm not sure I'm doing things correctly. Am I
missing something in the procedure to bring it to the correct people
attention?
Thanks,
--Simone
---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: <bugzilla(a)redhat.com>
Date: 5 January 2012 18:14
Subject: [Bug 771941] Review Request: bacula-docs - Bacula documentation
To: negativo17(a)gmail.com
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=771941
--- Comment #1 from Simone Caronni <negativo17(a)gmail.com> 2012-01-05
12:14:45 EST ---
Updated; as suggested I created a bacula-devel subpackage that's required by
bacula-docs to build. Thanks Tom Callaway:
Spec URL:
http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/bacula.spec
SRPM URL:
http://slaanesh.fedorapeople.org/bacula-docs-5.2.3-7.fc16.src.rpm
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You reported the bug.
--
You cannot discover new oceans unless you have the courage to lose sight of
the shore (R. W. Emerson).