Hi,
I would like to co-maintain gdal and grass packages. I am working on Fedora GIS spin:
We need to fix some issues in the above packages:
gdal : we care not shipping the jnis, java is broken and need to fix grass : A very old GRASS version is packaged, it lacks more than 9000 fixes and enhancements with respect to the current stable version which is GRASS 6.4.0
Please share your thoughts
Thanks Viji
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 11:08 PM, Viji V Nair viji@fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi,
I am working on geoserver package for fedora. For the same I would require the following libraries, those are not included in the gdal package, is there any specific reason to exclude the same? can you please let me know ?
libgdaljni.so libogrjni.so libgdalconstjni.so libosrjni.so
Thanks Viji
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 01:54:10PM +0530, Viji V Nair wrote:
Hi,
I would like to co-maintain gdal and grass packages. I am working on Fedora GIS spin:
We need to fix some issues in the above packages:
gdal : we care not shipping the jnis, java is broken and need to fix grass : A very old GRASS version is packaged, it lacks more than 9000 fixes and enhancements with respect to the current stable version which is GRASS 6.4.0
Please share your thoughts
This is not the right list for those discussions. The right list is fedora development list. You can also use the per-package mail alias, it will go to all the co-maintainers of a package.
Other than that, I fully agree that an update to grass 6.4.0 would clearly be right.
packaging@lists.fedoraproject.org