https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Bojan Jovanovic <bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.rs> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.r |
|s) |
--- Comment #18 from Bojan Jovanovic <bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.rs> ---
(In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #16)
> @bojov@fon.bg.ac.rs If you think that the problem could be with locales, you
> could change to en_US and test.
> We need to simplify the case.
I tried in the following configurations:
Fedora 40 workstation - from locale.conf:
- LANG="en_US.UTF-8" only.
- custom locale.conf
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_TIME="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_MONETARI="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_PAPER="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_MEASUREMENT="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
Fedora 40 KDE Plasma 6 - with locale.conf:
- LANG="en_US.UTF-8" only.
autoreconf (called from pdf-tools-install) works as expected - no sigsev 11
It not works in KDE Plasma 6 with a custom locale.conf.
Note: locale.conf is customized with "Region & Language" from System Settings
in both environments.
I also noticed that the Gnome environment settings are applied system-wide,
while in KDE the same settings are applied per user.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Bojan Jovanovic <bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.rs> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Flags|needinfo?(bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.r |
|s) |
--- Comment #15 from Bojan Jovanovic <bojov(a)fon.bg.ac.rs> ---
(In reply to Michal Josef Spacek from comment #14)
> @bojov@fon.bg.ac.rs Hi, how to reproduce this issue?
>
> As I see pdf-tools-install is lisp code (this
> https://github.com/politza/pdf-tools one?).
> Is it installed from the package or how?
>
> Could you describe the process?
Fedora 40, KDE Plasma 6, emacs from the Fedora repos, doom-emacs, pdf module
enabled in the user's init.el file (after enabling the /path/to/doom sinc
module).
Since the pdf-tools package (http://github.com/vedang/pdf-tools/ also in the
elpa.nongn repo) requires (re)building the epdfifno program then I have to call
the M-k pdf-tools-install command.
During command execution, it starts building the epdfinfo program and calls
automake.
Epdfinfo is built and working as expected.
Another note, F40 is installed with English language support, and I added
Serbian and Serbian Latin keyboards and the glibc-langpack-sr package. I also
copied the locale.conf (from the Gnome installation) with the following content
:
LANG="en_US.UTF-8"
LC_NUMERIC="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_TIME="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_MONETARY="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_PAPER="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
LC_MEASUREMENT="sr_RS.UTF-8@latin"
I suspect this may be a problem due to a bug in the freelocale function?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291117
Bug ID: 2291117
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Net-ARP in epel8 and
epel9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Net-ARP
Assignee: robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Reporter: jonathan(a)almalinux.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
robinlee.sysu(a)gmail.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-Net-ARP in epel8 and epel9.
If you do not wish to maintain perl-Net-ARP in epel9,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Net-ARP/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: jonathanspw).
I can be the primary contact for EPEL (FAS: jonathanspw).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2291117
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Frédéric Bérat <fberat(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value
Component|automake |perl
CC| |iarnell(a)gmail.com,
| |jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
| |mmaslano(a)redhat.com,
| |mspacek(a)redhat.com,
| |perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproj
| |ect.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com,
| |psabata(a)redhat.com,
| |rhughes(a)redhat.com,
| |spotrh(a)gmail.com
Assignee|fberat(a)redhat.com |jplesnik(a)redhat.com
--- Comment #13 from Frédéric Bérat <fberat(a)redhat.com> ---
Re-assign to Perl. The crash occurs in the interpreter, automake has nothing to
do with it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2290636
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
Bug ID: 2037854
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel9
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-RC4
Assignee: ppisar(a)redhat.com
Reporter: paul(a)city-fan.org
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: me(a)fale.io, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-Crypt-RC4 for EPEL 9.
If you like you could add me (FAS: pghmcfc) as a committer to the package and
I'll do it myself.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2037854
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284393
Bug ID: 2284393
Summary: perl-Log-Trivial-0.40-29.fc41 FTBFS: rm: cannot remove
'*.list': No such file or directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Log-Trivial
Assignee: orion(a)nwra.com
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: orion(a)nwra.com, perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Blocks: 2260875 (F41FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Log-Trivial-0.40-29.fc41 fails to build in Fedora 41 because a %check
phase fails like this:
+ CC=gcc
+ export CC
+ CXX=g++
+ export CXX
+ cd Log-Trivial-0.40
+ rm '*.list'
rm: cannot remove '*.list': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.54Da2m (%check)
This is probably triggered by new rpm-build-4.19.91 which changed how debuginfo
generators are executed.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260875
[Bug 2260875] Fedora 41 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284393
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282000
Bug ID: 2282000
Summary: The directory /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Getopt is
not in the RPM database.
Product: Fedora
Version: 40
Hardware: x86_64
OS: Linux
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Getopt-Long
Severity: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: pampelmuse(a)gmx.at
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com, mspacek(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, ppisar(a)redhat.com
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
The directory /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Getopt is not in the RPM database.
Reproducible: Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpm -qf /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Getopt/
file /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Getopt is not owned by any package
Actual Results:
file /usr/share/perl5/vendor_perl/Getopt is not owned by any package
Expected Results:
perl-Getopt-Long-2.57-3.fc40.noarch
In "perl-Getopt-Long.spec" at line 85 please add:
%dir %{perl_vendorlib}/Getopt/
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2282000
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284392
Bug ID: 2284392
Summary: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.01-25.fc41 FTBFS: rm: cannot
remove '*.list': No such file or directory
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Crypt-CipherSaber
Assignee: xavier(a)bachelot.org
Reporter: ppisar(a)redhat.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
xavier(a)bachelot.org
Blocks: 2260875 (F41FTBFS,RAWHIDEFTBFS)
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
perl-Crypt-CipherSaber-1.01-25.fc41 fails to build in F41 because a %check
phase fails like this:
+ CC=gcc
+ export CC
+ CXX=g++
+ export CXX
+ cd Crypt-CipherSaber-1.01
+ rm '*.list'
rm: cannot remove '*.list': No such file or directory
error: Bad exit status from /var/tmp/rpm-tmp.Rg3I4S (%check)
This is probably triggered by new rpm-build-4.19.91 which changed how debuginfo
generators are executed.
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2260875
[Bug 2260875] Fedora 41 FTBFS Tracker
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2284392
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277375
Bug ID: 2277375
Summary: Please branch and build perl-Fuse for EPEL8
Product: Fedora EPEL
Version: epel8
Status: NEW
Component: perl-Fuse
Severity: medium
Assignee: jplesnik(a)redhat.com
Reporter: orion(a)nwra.com
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: jplesnik(a)redhat.com,
perl-devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Target Milestone: ---
Classification: Fedora
Please branch and build perl-Fuse in epel8.
If you do not wish to maintain perl-Fuse in epel8,
or do not think you will be able to do this in a timely manner,
the EPEL Packagers SIG would be happy to be a co-maintainer of the package;
please add the epel-packagers-sig group through
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/perl-Fuse/addgroup
and grant it commit access, or collaborator access on epel* branches.
I would also be happy to be a co-maintainer (FAS: orion).
I can be the primary contact for EPEL (FAS: orion).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2277375
Report this comment as SPAM: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Bugzilla&format=report-sp…