[Bug 79360] Net::Ping succeeds regardless of port assignment
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Net::Ping succeeds regardless of port assignment
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79360
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-28 03:28 EST -------
Can someone test the script provided in this report and verify if this is still
an issue?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 11 months
[Bug 60853] Perl doesn't look for modules in /usr/local
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Perl doesn't look for modules in /usr/local
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60853
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
CC| |fedora-perl-devel-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-28 03:26 EST -------
Still an issue in FC4? I think it isn't, but I would like confirmation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 11 months
[Bug 158733] perl(Inline) duplication
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl(Inline) duplication
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=158733
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2005-05-28 03:03 EST -------
ia64 build failure of this plus perl-PDL-2.4.2. All other archs succeeded build
and tests. Please advise.
t/dumper....................Fatal error: argument is probably not a piddle, or
magic no overwritten. You're in trouble, guv: 195584 9360880 8181832
(in cleanup) Fatal error: argument is probably not a piddle, or magic no
overwritten. You're in trouble, guv: 195488 9331696 9416000
(in cleanup) Fatal error: argument is probably not a piddle, or magic no
overwritten. You're in trouble, guv: 195584 9360880 8181832
(in cleanup) Fatal error: argument is probably not a piddle, or magic no
overwritten. You're in trouble, guv: 195632 9330992 9185776
dubious
Test returned status 255 (wstat 65280, 0xff00)
DIED. FAILED tests 6-16
Failed 11/16 tests, 31.25% okay
t/gsl_interp................dubious
Test returned status 0 (wstat 11, 0xb)
DIED. FAILED tests 1-10
Failed 10/10 tests, 0.00% okay
Summary:
Failed 3/96 test scripts, 96.88% okay. 21/797 subtests failed, 97.37% okay.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 11 months
umask problems
by Warren Togami
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=73905
There are many perl* bugs for these umask problems, where installed
packages are broken if the system umask is 077. Can someone verify if
this is still a problem and close bugs that are fixed?
Jose did your spec cleanups solve these problems?
Thanks,
Warren Togami
wtogami(a)redhat.com
18 years, 11 months