[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354
------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-01-17 03:25 EST -------
Thanks Tom.
Ville: I'm not going to approve a perl package which processes insecure data. At
least not before taking a few perl tutorials/courses first. You can call me
paranoïd if you like, but perl is very low in my trust scale, and I don't know
it enough to do an educated evaluation.
(and yes I'm ready to trust my own data to a package I wouldn't approve - but
then I've been running rawhide for more years I care to remember now)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 3 months
[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354
tcallawa(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
AssignedTo|gdk(a)redhat.com |tcallawa(a)redhat.com
OtherBugsDependingO|163776 |163779
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From tcallawa(a)redhat.com 2006-01-16 23:21 EST -------
Since there are no obvious showstoppers in this bug ticket, I'll review this:
Good:
- rpmlint checks return:
E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd/db amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd/db amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd/db 0700
W: amavisd-new dangling-relative-symlink /usr/sbin/clamd.amavisd clamd
E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd 0700
E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/run/amavisd amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/run/amavisd amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-uid /var/spool/amavisd/tmp amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-gid /var/spool/amavisd/tmp amavis
E: amavisd-new non-standard-dir-perm /var/spool/amavisd/tmp 0700
E: amavisd-new init-script-name-with-dot /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd
E: amavisd-new no-status-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd
W: amavisd-new no-reload-entry /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd
E: amavisd-new subsys-not-used /etc/rc.d/init.d/clamd.amavisd
E: amavisd-new incoherent-subsys /etc/rc.d/init.d/amavisd ${prog_base}
I think all of these are safe to ignore.
- package meets naming guidelines
- package meets packaging guidelines
- license (GPL) OK, text in %doc, matches source
- spec file legible, in am. english
- source matches upstream
- package compiles on devel (x86)
- no missing BR
- no unnecessary BR
- no locales
- not relocatable
- owns all directories that it creates
- no duplicate files
- permissions ok
- %clean ok
- macro use consistent
- code, not content
- no need for -docs
- nothing in %doc affects runtime
- no need for .desktop file
APPROVED.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 3 months
[Bug 167354] Review Request: amavisd-new
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: amavisd-new
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=167354
Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO| |177841
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net 2006-01-16 18:17 EST -------
And while I'm a it, I've updated perl-Convert-UUlib too
(still happily running Steve's original package 24h/24 7j/j since last september
at least without any hitch - can't anyone approve this?)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 3 months
Provides: perl(main)
by Ralf Corsepius
Hi,
I just tripped several perl-packages in Fedora, which
Provide: perl(main)
AFAIS, most of them originate from perl modules using
package main;
somewhere in their code.
I am inclined to consider letting rpms "provide: perl(main)" as
packaging bug (perl(main) should better be filtered out for them),
but am not sure about it.
A quick check on my FC4+FE4 systems reveals these packages:
# rpm -q --whatprovides 'perl(main)'
mod_perl-2.0.1-1.fc4
perl-MIME-tools-5.417-2
perl-HTML-Tree-3.18-3
latex2html-2002.2.1-3
perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.94-5
perl-5.8.6-22
Ralf
18 years, 3 months