[Bug 199372] New: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199372
Summary: PATCH: sparc64 use CFLAGS
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: sparc64
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: jvdias(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dennis(a)ausil.us
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
sparc64 needs to use CFLAGS with CC to link properly using gcc the attached
patch fixes this issue
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
Expected results:
Additional info:
------- Additional Comments From dennis(a)ausil.us 2006-07-18 23:33 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=132651)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=132651&action=view)
use cflags
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 208315] New: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in Net::DNS 0.59
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208315
Summary: Inconsistent handling of reverse IP lookup fixed in
Net::DNS 0.59
Product: Fedora Core
Version: test3
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Net-DNS
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rwfranks(a)acm.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Perl-Net-DNS-0.58 resolver search(), query(), bgsend() and send() methods not
consistent in interpreting IPv4 and IPv6 addresses as a PTR query.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
0.58
Additional info:
Since FC6-test3 went to press, Net::DNS 0.59 has been released.
I realise that final release deadline is uncomfortably close, but think that the
revised module fixes enough inconsistent and outright wrong behaviour to be well
worth getting into FC6 if this is still possible.
The CPAN bug references are:
#20857 Resolver query() treats empty or undef name as default domain.
#20994 Resolver search() erroneously applies search list to IPv6 address.
#21402 Unable to prebuild PTR query from IP using Net::DNS:Packet->new().
The search() query() send() bgsend() and Packet->new() methods are now 100%
consistent in the form of argument they accept.
The inconsistency was reported in CPAN bug #20836 (later merged with #21402)
I can confirm that revised module has been tested using FC5.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months
[Bug 208535] New: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=208535
Summary: perl-Net-DNS package in FC6 is older than in FC5 updates
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: perl-Net-DNS
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: matthias(a)rpmforge.net
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list@redhat.com,jkeating(a)redhat.com
>From the automated check script :
perl-Net-DNS
FC5-updates > FC6 (0:0.59-1.fc5 > 0:0.58-1.fc6)
So please update the FC6 package and make sure it gets in before FC6 final,
otherwise the module might break for upgrades from FC5 to FC6.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
17 years, 6 months