[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
------- Additional Comments From altblue(a)n0i.net 2006-03-10 05:08 EST -------
If somebody dropped the ball again on NDBM issues and now you're again at
updating the spec, Jason, would you please be so kind to properly fix it so it
won't drop my beloved dbm filters? :(
Memento (as many people - me included - told it a thousand times): this line is
completely wrong:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*DBM_Filter*' | xargs rm -rfv
as it does NOT drop "NDBM" filters ONLY, but every DBM filters :(
Our approach is to add -Dnoextensions='NDBM_File' to Configure parameters and
then, in %install:
find $RPM_BUILD_ROOT -name '*NDBM*' -delete || :
so it will drop every _other_ NDBM hooks (i.e. Memoize)
TIA.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month
Filtering requires/provides
by Paul Howarth
The current suggestion on the Packaging/Perl wiki page is (for Requires,
Provides works the same) is:
----------------------------------------------------------------------
# Filter unwanted Requires:
cat << \EOF > %{name}-req
#!/bin/sh
%{__perl_requires} $* |\
sed -e '/perl(unwanted_require)/d'
EOF
%define __perl_requires %{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}/%{name}-req
chmod +x %{__perl_requires}
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This won't work for the majority of perl modules because the build
directory is %{_builddir}/MODULENAME-%{version} rather than
%{_builddir}/%{name}-%{version}.
A simpler way that avoids generating script files at all might be:
%global filtered_requires sh -c '%{__perl_requires} "$@" | %{__sed} -e
"/^perl(unwanted_require)$/d"'
%define __perl_requires %{filtered_requires}
Anyone see any problems with this?
P.S. I'm not an rpm macro expert and don't really know the significance
of %global but using %define in its place results in a recursive macro
definition, which doesn't work.
Paul.
18 years, 1 month
[Bug 151194] perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl-RPM2 installs into site_perl; should set INSTALLDIRS=vendor
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=151194
jvdias(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
Fixed In Version| |perl-RPM2-0.66-12
------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-09 12:02 EST -------
perl-RPM2 is now deprecated (no longer shipped as part of Fedora Core).
With the latest version of the .spec file submitted for Fedora Extras
consideration, this problem does not occur (installs correctly in vendorlib).
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month
[Bug 84671] perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: perl: should something obsolete perl-NDBM_File?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84671
jvdias(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |MODIFIED
------- Additional Comments From jvdias(a)redhat.com 2006-03-08 17:47 EST -------
So AFAIK the only disparity left with the current perl is :
...
Conflicts: perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6
...
Now that the current perl removes NDBM::File, the above seems to be the
only relic . Since nothing in core or extras provides perl-NDBM-File,
including perl, this line should be removed.
I've now removed the 'Conflicts: perl-NDBM_File <= 1:1.75-34.99.6' tag
from the perl-5.8.8-5+ .spec file in CVS - it will go in with the next
version, but I don't think this problem warrants a perl respin for FC-5.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month
[Bug 161785] spamassassin restart fails - functions bug?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: spamassassin restart fails - functions bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=161785
wtogami(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
OtherBugsDependingO|150222, 158504 |171491
nThis| |
------- Additional Comments From wtogami(a)redhat.com 2006-03-08 11:40 EST -------
This is essentially fixed in FC5 and RHEL4U3, but I want to do a little more
cleaning up of this before closing this bug.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
18 years, 1 month