[Bug 251850] New: Please add altermime dep
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251850
Summary: Please add altermime dep
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: amavisd-new
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
amavisd-new can use altermime which is available in the Fedora repo, so it
should declare an altermime dep
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 248731] New: cpan2rpm doesn't work when first file in tarball isn't a directory
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=248731
Summary: cpan2rpm doesn't work when first file in tarball isn't a
directory
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: cpan2rpm
AssignedTo: ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com
ReportedBy: jik(a)kamens.brookline.ma.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Tried to run "cpan2rpm Tk". The first file in Tk-804.027.tar.gz is Tk-
804.027/COPYING, i.e., it isn't the root directory of the tarball, which is
what cpan2rpm is expecting. cpan2rpm fails with:
get_meta(): Not a directory at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 393.
I added a bit more info to that error message and it reports:
get_meta(): chdir(/tmp/ZhnL73u9em/Tk-804.027/COPYING): Not a directory
at /usr/bin/cpan2rpm line 393.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 3 months
[Bug 419601] New: missing build requirement
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419601
Summary: missing build requirement
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Text-Levenshtein
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
rebuild of this package fails with 'Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: blib/lib blib/arch /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib64/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl /usr/lib64/perl5/5.8.8/x86_64-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8 .) at test.pl line 2.. Loo!
ks like the perl-Test-Simple package isn't in the chain of build requirements anymore and needs to be added to this package
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 7 months
[Bug 419611] New: missing build requirement
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=419611
Summary: missing build requirement
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Text-Levenshtein
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: karsten(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
rebuild of this package fails with 'Can't locate Test/More.pm in @INC (@INC contains: (long path list deleted) .) at test.pl line 2..' Looks like the perl-Test-Simple package isn't in the chain of build requirements anymore and needs to be added to this package or maybe to perl-test-harness
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 7 months
CPAN -> fedora mapping update!
by Chris Weyl
Hey all --
I put some additional work into the CPAN->Fedora mapping tools over
Thanksgiving break...
* version info is now pulled from koji
* version in testing, if available, is published
* versions pre F-7 are not pulled (working to fix this)
* data is now stored in a backend db
* upstream-querying is now modular, so querying other upstreams (e.g.
for non-perl) should just be a matter of writing the correct backend
extension and providing a way to determine it should be used against a
package.
The page is still up out at http://fedora.biggerontheinside.net/perl/.
Note I consider the page a stop-gap; next time I get some cycles I'll
probably give Catalyst a whirl and see if I can't make something nice
and dynamic to present it :) Note also there are CSS issues; I've
asked the infrastructure list to set me right. I'm also looking to
leverage a greater integration with koji and the packagedb as
opportunities present themselves.
The code is out under the camelus hosted project[1] It's still early,
mildly slap-dash and requires a bunch of modules not yet available in
Fedora (a number of MooseX ones and DBIx::Class spring to mind).
Patches / comments / collaboration quite welcome :)
-Chris
[1] https://hosted.fedoraproject.org/projects/camelus/
--
Chris Weyl
Ex astris, scientia
15 years, 8 months
[Bug 251960] New: perl-File-Which for EPEL?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=251960
Summary: perl-File-Which for EPEL?
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: medium
Component: perl-File-Which
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Hi - can I get perl-File-Which for EPEL? I need it for bug #250493 . Or I'd be
happy to own it if you don't want to.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 9 months
[Bug 245225] New: perl-GD build warning perl-GD-2.35-2.fc6.src.rpm
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=245225
Summary: perl-GD build warning perl-GD-2.35-2.fc6.src.rpm
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-GD
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: herrold(a)owlriver.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
perl-GD emits header related warnings during its build -- eitehr its
expectation, of that of gd-devel as to header placement are wrong, and the
warning should be addressed
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-GD-2.35-2.fc6.src.rpm
$ rpm -qf /usr/include/gd.h
gd-devel-2.0.33-9.3.fc6
How reproducible:
rpmbuild --rebuild perl-GD-2.35-2.fc6.src.rpm 2>&1 | grep Warning
Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.
Actual results:
(from my error and warning checker) Error: perl cruft found -|1|-
** WARNING: found gd.h header file in /usr/include/gd.h, but it is expected at
/usr/include/gd.h. This may cause compile errors! **
Expected results:
no warning to stderr, and no error as well [ a > /dev/null is inappropriate ;) ]
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 9 months
[Bug 275271] New: cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=275271
Summary: cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers
Product: Fedora
Version: f7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: medium
Component: cpan2rpm
AssignedTo: ghenry(a)suretecsystems.com
ReportedBy: marcos.marado(a)sonae.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
cpan2rpm deals badly with letters in version numbers. This makes, for instance,
cpan2rpm SOAP::Lite to think that 0.60a is the latest version, instead of 0.69.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
cpan2rpm-2.028-2.fc6
How reproducible:
Allways.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install cpan2rpm
2. cpan2rpm SOAP::Lite
3. Check the version of the generated RPM
Actual results:
A RPM from SOAP::Lite 0.60a is generated.
Expected results:
A RPM from SOAP::Lite 0.69 generated.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months