[Bug 240596] New: Perl perl-5.8.8-17.fc7 update doesn't requires perl-libs resulting in broken lib
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240596
Summary: Perl perl-5.8.8-17.fc7 update doesn't requires perl-libs
resulting in broken lib
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: medium
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: gbillios(a)gmail.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
With the perl-5.8.8-17.fc7 update some libs like libperl.so were moves to
perl-libs package but this was not installed during update resulting in some
programs even perl to complain that they can't find libperl.so
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-17.fc7
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Update from previous ver to perl-5.8.8-17.fc7 with yum
2.run eg. perl or vim
3.
Actual results:
can't find libperl.so
Expected results:
run normally
Additional info:
Installing manually perl-libs package solves it
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months
More on perl for F7
by Robin Norwood
Hi,
We've been discussing the perl split and how to minimize disruption for
users. Warren, spot, and I are seeing about getting the 'core' perl
packages that have been split into separate RPMs added to the list of
packages that get installed by default whenever perl is installed. This
way, most users will still have CPAN + co, but we'll still have most of
the advantages we wanted from splitting them out in the first place.
This basically changes the 'build/devel' related perl modules from
opt-in to opt-out for F7.
What do you think?
For reference, these are the packages in question:
perl-devel
perl-CPAN
perl-ExtUtils-Embed
perl-ExtUtils-MakeMaker
perl-Test-Harness
perl-Test-Simple
-RN
--
Robin Norwood
Red Hat, Inc.
"The Sage does nothing, yet nothing remains undone."
-Lao Tzu, Te Tao Ching
16 years, 10 months
[Bug 240401] New: Typo in /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240401
Summary: Typo in /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux
Version: 5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: jplans(a)redhat.com
CC: GavinFlower@yahoo.com,_@sucs.org,benny+bugzilla(a)amorsen.
dk,bojan@rexursive.com,djuran@redhat.com,dmobrien_2001(a)y
ahoo.com,fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com,frank-
buettner@gmx.net,hongjiu.lu@intel.com,ian(a)iay.org.uk,jm@
jmason.org,jm@mailsnare.net,mishu(a)piatafinanciara.ro,mus
uruan@gmail.com,parkerm@pobox.com,reg+redhat(a)sidney.com,
tom@compton.nu,tuju@iki.fi,wtogami(a)redhat.com
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #223753 +++
Description of problem:
logrotate error message:
error: sa-update:3 unknown option 'notifyempty' -- ignoring line
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spamassassin-3.1.7-4.fc6
Fix:
Something like this:
/var/log/sa-update.log {
monthly
- notifyempty
+ notifempty
missingok
}
-- Additional comment from wtogami(a)redhat.com on 2007-01-23 10:49 EST --
*** Bug 223972 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-- Additional comment from _(a)sucs.org on 2007-01-24 04:04 EST --
This applies to FC5 as well.
-- Additional comment from joshua(a)iwsp.com on 2007-01-24 11:31 EST --
I get nightly email about this... apply that patch and push the fix!!
-- Additional comment from wtogami(a)redhat.com on 2007-01-24 15:33 EST --
spamassassin-3.1.7-5.fcX will be pushed soon to solve this issue.
-- Additional comment from wtogami(a)redhat.com on 2007-01-24 15:33 EST --
*** Bug 224179 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-- Additional comment from paul(a)city-fan.org on 2007-01-26 05:42 EST --
*** Bug 224547 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-- Additional comment from wtogami(a)redhat.com on 2007-01-28 00:05 EST --
This is now fixed in FC5 and FC6 updates.
-- Additional comment from paul(a)city-fan.org on 2007-01-29 07:40 EST --
*** Bug 225144 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
-- Additional comment from paul(a)city-fan.org on 2007-01-29 08:13 EST --
*** Bug 225039 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
------- Additional Comments From jplans(a)redhat.com 2007-05-17 05:55 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=154902)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=154902&action=view)
sa-update.logrotate.patch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months
[Bug 223753] New: Typo in /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=223753
Summary: Typo in /etc/logrotate.d/sa-update
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: adrian(a)lisas.de
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
logrotate error message:
error: sa-update:3 unknown option 'notifyempty' -- ignoring line
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spamassassin-3.1.7-4.fc6
Fix:
Something like this:
/var/log/sa-update.log {
monthly
- notifyempty
+ notifempty
missingok
}
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months
[Bug 240192] New: Add co-maintainers to the perl RPM
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=240192
Summary: Add co-maintainers to the perl RPM
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl
Updated Fedora Owners: rc040203(a)freenet.de, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
Updated Fedora CC: rc040203(a)freenet.de, tcallawa(a)redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months
[Bug 235835] New: can you build for EL5?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=235835
Summary: can you build for EL5?
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-IO-Multiplex
AssignedTo: lmb(a)biosci.ki.se
ReportedBy: bpeck(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
I have a package in Extras called conmux which uses perl-IO-Multiplex on the
server side. I was wondering if you could build perl-IO-Multiplex for EL5 as well.
Thanks!
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months
[Bug 184530] Review Request: perl-RPM2
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: perl-RPM2
Alias: perl-RPM2
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=184530
rnorwood(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |CURRENTRELEASE
Fixed In Version| |F7
------- Additional Comments From rnorwood(a)redhat.com 2007-05-08 10:22 EST -------
"""
Package: perl-RPM2
NVR: perl-RPM2-0.67-2.fc7
User: jkeating
Status: complete
Tag Operation: tagged
Into Tag: f7-final
perl-RPM2-0.67-2.fc7 successfully tagged into f7-final by jkeating
"""
Ok, Jose, *now* can I close the bug? ;-)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 10 months