[Bug 242249] New: syntax error in perl5db.pl
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242249
Summary: syntax error in perl5db.pl
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: ihok(a)hotmail.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Unmatched right curly bracket at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628]
line 5, at end of line
syntax error at (eval 48)[/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/perl5db.pl:628] line 5, near ";
}"
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-5.8.8-10
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 228043] New: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from 32bit?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228043
Summary: ??? 64bit sa-update.1 manpage timestamp differs from
32bit?
Product: Fedora Core
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: wtogami(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Odd minor problem... low priority.
/usr/share/man/man1/sa-update.1.gz differs by the following unidiff between the
32bit and 64bit architecture builds of spamassassin.
--- 32 2007-02-09 12:46:19.000000000 -0500
+++ 64 2007-02-09 12:46:10.000000000 -0500
@@ -129,7 +129,7 @@
.\" ========================================================================
.\"
.IX Title "SA-UPDATE 1"
-.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2006-07-30" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
+.TH SA-UPDATE 1 "2007-01-22" "perl v5.8.5" "User Contributed Perl Documentation"
.SH "NAME"
sa\-update \- automate SpamAssassin rule updates
.SH "SYNOPSIS"
This appears to be the only difference in version 3.1.7. Notice that the 32bit
version retained the original source timestamp, while the 64bit version somehow
decided to differ in this behavior by changing the timestamp to the build date.
The above example is 3.1.7 built on RHEL4, but this persists through perl-5.8.8
in FC7 too.
While this appears to create a multilib conflict, in practice this is not a real
problem because spamassassin is based on perl, and we don't ship both archs in a
multilib distribution.
This bug is merely to figure out *why* it is behaving in this strange way
betweeen 32bit and 64bit builds.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 232481] New: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=232481
Summary: EPEL branches: a couple of perl packages from fedora.us
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: perl-pmtools
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Branches: EPEL4 and EPEL5
Perl packages to branch:
* perl-pmtools
* perl-ExtUtils-CBuilder
* perl-ExtUtils-ParseXS
Note:
* Please create the EPEL branchs from the devel or FC-6
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 227622] New: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=227622
Summary: Unable to pass argument to sa-update
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: milan.kerslager(a)pslib.cz
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
As there is a standartized cron script now to utilize sa-update, please allow
pass arguments to this command. Use /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin to set
$SAUPDATEOPT, and use this in /usr/share/spamassassin/sa-update.cron:
[...]
if [ -f /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin ]; then
. /etc/sysconfig/spamassassin
fi
/usr/bin/sa-update $SAUPDATEOPT
These argument are necessary to be able to alter sa-update default behaviour.
Also I dislike output (echo commands with mailing to root by cron daemon) in
this file even there is no (error) output. Please remove it along with tee
commad and redirection of output in the file /etc/cron.d/sa-update. Unix-like
style is to report nothing when there is no error.
There is also a possibility to add -D (--debug [area=n,...]) argument to the
sa-update to get output mailed if one need it.
Thank you.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 228688] New: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228688
Summary: invalid syntax results in interpreter seg fault
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: normal
Component: perl
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: robert.haas(a)tekconnect.com
QAContact: dkl(a)redhat.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Attempting to execute the following code produces a segmentation fault:
sub frob {
my ($r) = @_;
sub {
. 3;
};
}
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): perl-5.8.8-10
How reproducible: Run the code above.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Save the code above in a text file (6 lines) called "oops".
2. Type "perl < oops"
Actual results:
Seg fault
Expected results:
Syntax error
Additional info:
None
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 271341] New: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=271341
Summary: IPC::Shareable fails to build on RHEL/CentOS 5
Product: Fedora
Version: f7
Platform: All
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: medium
Component: perl-IPC-Shareable
AssignedTo: jpo(a)di.uminho.pt
ReportedBy: matt(a)bodgit-n-scarper.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
(Not quite sure what components this should ultimately be filed under, Fedora 7
at least has the perl-IPC-Shareable component)
Description of problem:
I'm trying to rebuild the FC6/F7 perl-IPC-Shareable Perl module for CentOS 5
x86_64 (like the EPEL RPMs), and it stalls as part of the "make test" phase:
...
+ make test
PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0,
'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t
t/00base......ok
t/05sv........ok
t/10av........ok
t/15hv........ok
t/20ref.......ok
t/25ipc.......ok
t/30lock......ok
t/35clean.....ok
t/36ipcav.....ok
t/38ipchv.....ok 1/5
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm
How reproducible:
Always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. rpmbuild --rebuild perl-IPC-Shareable-0.60-3.fc6.src.rpm
Actual results:
Stalls at 1/5 in the 38ipchv tests
Expected results:
Should complete cleanly with no errors
Additional info:
Build host is fully updated CentOS 5 x86_64 installation. Build completes
correctly on a Fedora 7 installation.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 11 months
[Bug 242065] New: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=242065
Summary: perl-CGI-Session is not available in FE6
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-CGI-Session
AssignedTo: andreas(a)bawue.net
ReportedBy: jeff(a)ocjtech.us
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
perl-CGI-Session is not available in Fedora Extras 6.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. yum install perl-CGI-Session
Actual results:
# rpm -q perl-CGI-Session
package perl-CGI-Session is not installed
# yum install perl-CGI-Session
Loading "installonlyn" plugin
Setting up Install Process
Setting up repositories
Reading repository metadata in from local files
Parsing package install arguments
Nothing to do
Expected results:
perl-CGI-Session gets installed.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 12 months
[Bug 214709] New: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone.
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=214709
Summary: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone.
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc6
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: normal
Component: perl-DateManip
AssignedTo: rnorwood(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: eploko(a)gmail.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
>From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1) Gecko/20061024 Firefox/2.0
Description of problem:
I have set up my timezone as "Asia/Krasnoyarsk" when installing FC6. It corresponds to the KRAT time zone as reported by the date command.
The problem is the perl Date::Manip module isn't recognizing this timezone. If you run perldoc Date::Manip and see the list of the zones it understands, you'll see the KRAT zone isn't listed. Eventually, KRAT is equal to CCT (+0800 China Coast, USSR Zone 7) and echoing CCT to /etc/timezone makes the Date::Manip module happy. But until you do so, all the perl scripts that use Date::Manip fail to run, including /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-DateManip-5.44-1.2.1
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Set timezone to KRAT.
2. Run /etc/cron.daily/0logwatch
Actual Results:
ERROR: Date::Manip unable to determine TimeZone.
Execute the following command in a shell prompt:
perldoc Date::Manip
The section titled TIMEZONES describes valid TimeZones
and where they can be defined.
Expected Results:
The command should run fluently w/o an error.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 202402] New: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=202402
Summary: Missing perl-Archive-Tar Dependancy in RPM
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: scott(a)staff.telkomsa.net
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The package perl-Archive-Tar is a dependancy for sa-update, shipped with latest
version of Spamasssassin
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
How reproducible:
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install SpamAssassin 3.1.* from FC5 Core
2. run sa-update
3.
Actual results:
Fails to run because no Archive/Tar.pm found
Expected results:
sa-update should execute with no problems.
Additional info:
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years
[Bug 193100] New: sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=193100
Summary: sa-update failed to execute without some dependency RPMs
Product: Fedora Core
Version: fc5
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: normal
Component: spamassassin
AssignedTo: wtogami(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: masanari_iida(a)hp.com
CC: fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,felicity@kluge.net,jm(a)jmason.org,parkerm
@pobox.com,reg+redhat@sidney.com,wtogami(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Dependency missing in spec file.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
spamassassin-3.1.1-1.fc5
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install spamassassin
2. execute sa-update
3.
Actual results:
# sa-update
Can't locate Archive/Tar.pm in @INC (@INC contains:
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.8
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.8 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.7
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.6 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.5
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.4 /usr/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.8.3
/usr/lib/perl5/site_perl
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3/i386-linux-thread-multi
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.7 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.6
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.5 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.4
/usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.3 /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl
/usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8/i386-linux-thread-multi /usr/lib/perl5/5.8.8) at
/usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
BEGIN failed--compilation aborted at /usr/bin/sa-update line 81.
Expected results:
No error.
Additional info:
Following RPMs are missing in dependency section of the spec file.
perl-IO-Zlib
perl-Archive-Tar
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years