[Bug 247253] New: Conflicting Provides
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=247253
Summary: Conflicting Provides
Product: Fedora
Version: f7
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL
AssignedTo: chris(a)chrisgrau.com
ReportedBy: bugs.michael(a)gmx.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
perl-Time-Piece provides perl(Time::Piece) EQ 0 1.09
perl-Time-Piece-MySQL provides perl(Time::Piece)
required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch
required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch
required by: perl-Time-Piece-MySQL - 0.05-3.fc6.noarch
required by: perl-Email-Date - 1.102-2.fc7.noarch
Indeed. perl-Time-Piece-MySQL does not include a Time::Piece
module and therefore must not provide perl(Time::Piece).
Luck has it that a second dependency on Time::Seconds
pulls in perl-Time-Piece. Else it would break.
[...]
Further reference, similar cases:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-perl-devel-list/2007-July/msg00011...
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
12 years, 6 months
[Bug 450412] New: please build in EL-5
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=450412
Summary: please build in EL-5
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-JSON
AssignedTo: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
ReportedBy: jonstanley(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: bpeck@redhat.com,dmalcolm(a)redhat.com,fedora-perl-devel-
list@redhat.com,jlaska@redhat.com,poelstra(a)redhat.com
If you could branch this module for EL-5, it's required for Testopia, which is
currently under review.
I'd be happy to be co-maintainer for EPEL if you'd like, it builds fine as is in F9.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
12 years, 7 months
[Bug 228433] New: perl-version: EPEL branch?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=228433
Summary: perl-version: EPEL branch?
Product: Fedora Extras
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: normal
Component: perl-version
AssignedTo: tcallawa(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: cweyl(a)alumni.drew.edu
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
A project I'm working on uses perl(version) on RHEL4. Any chance of an EPEL
branch? :)
(note -- the specfile currently uses Build.PL; as perl-Module-Build isn't
available in EPEL yet, it'll probably be necessary to switch over to the
standard Makefile.PL provided.)
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 1 month
[Bug 357641] New: EL branches
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=357641
Summary: EL branches
Product: Fedora
Version: devel
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Tk
AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
ReportedBy: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Package Change Request
======================
Package Name: perl-Tk
New Branches: EL-4 EL-5
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 5 months
[Bug 427049] New: broken spec
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=427049
Summary: broken spec
Product: Fedora
Version: 8
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Class-Std
AssignedTo: andreas(a)bawue.net
ReportedBy: rc040203(a)freenet.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Package doesn't build, because the perl-package split has not been reflected to it.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
perl-Class-Std-0_0_8-1*
How to reproduce:
check out from CVS
make mockbuild
Additional info:
I would have fixed this bug in CVS, but you have restrictive ACLs
set on this package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 8 months
[Bug 456144] New: Package build failed
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456144
Summary: Package build failed
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: amavisd-new
AssignedTo: steve(a)silug.org
ReportedBy: miguel.filho(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
I've tried to build the 2.6.1 using the devel branch on CentOS 5, but two
patches fail to apply.
amavisd-conf.patch
amavisd-db.patch
I'm submitting updated patches that work.
------- Additional Comments From miguel.filho(a)gmail.com 2008-07-21 14:10 EST -------
Created an attachment (id=312286)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=312286&action=view)
Updated fix for amavisd-nanny
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
13 years, 9 months
[Bug 456019] New: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=456019
Summary: Can we have libpTk.a built shared within perl-Tk ?
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: perl-Tk
AssignedTo: andreas.bierfert(a)lowlatency.de
ReportedBy: kwizart(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-perl-devel-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem: libpTk.a is built statically within perl-Tk package.
This file isn't provided, so any dependency that what to extend the widget for
perl-Tk will need to build again this static library.
I would be better to have a shared built instead (if doable)
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): current perl-Tk
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. built a perl-Tk dependency that extend the widget capability
(case study perl-Tk-TableMatrix, see #444745)
2. by default it will build the libpTk.a again
3. Each Shared Objet widget will pick from libpTk.a as needed, raising the size
of the resulting .so (if not having duplicate code).
Actual results:
-llibpTk is using libpTk.a
Expected results:
-llibpTk should use libpTk.so
Additional info:
The related licenses files should probably be added to the package.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
14 years, 3 months